I haven't dumped Ubuntu over Shuttleworth's capitalism, but I have dumped
Unity, Software-Center and Ubuntu One and do not distribute them to my friends.
This is where the focus seems to be on monetized software, CLA agreements, etc.
I distribute older GNOME 2 Ubuntu, Ubuntu with gnome-shell
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 13:55 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
There has in fact been an outright malicious distro,
SphinxUX OS or something out of Egypt, and it was revealed on Phoronix
within a week of their initial lurid performance claims.
I didn't know this, when I searched the web and
Yeah-they also reported a bunch of hardware data back to a server controlled
by the owners of the project
On 06/22/2013 at 2:28 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 13:55 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
There has in fact been an outright malicious
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 20:28 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 13:55 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
There has in fact been an outright malicious distro,
SphinxUX OS or something out of Egypt, and it was revealed on Phoronix
within a week of their initial lurid
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:55 PM, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
I haven't dumped Ubuntu over Shuttleworth's capitalism, but I have dumped
Unity, Software-Center and Ubuntu One and do not distribute them to my
friends.
This is where the focus seems to be on monetized software, CLA agreements,
The fact that paid services are offered, and the fact that I prefer to limit all
network activity to the browser, apt-get, and wget for security reasons.
I like the old model: no support for anything paid, no support for DRM of
any kind, and no background network activity.
On 06/22/2013 at
I have taken some screen shots of our mergable menu in action.
http://www.ovenwerks.net/UStudiodocs/menu.html
(If you have looked at stuff here before you may need to use the refresh)
As you can see from the xubuntu/xfce versions of the menu, we can use this
to replace our special menu and just
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 20:41 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
There are additional reasons not to depend on USC: One of them
is that it is reported to be very difficult to install in Mint, into which
people might want to install US metas. All Ubuntustudio packages
are accessable from
On Fri, June 21, 2013 10:09 pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 20:41 -0400, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
There are additional reasons not to depend on USC: One of them
is that it is reported to be very difficult to install in Mint, into
which
people might want to install US
