On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:55:16AM -0400, Mike Holstein wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:33:58AM -0400, Mike Holstein wrote:
> > > how challenging would it be to take the current ubuntustudio-desktop
> > > metapackge and rename it to
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:33:58AM -0400, Mike Holstein wrote:
> > how challenging would it be to take the current ubuntustudio-desktop
> > metapackge and rename it to ubuntustudio-desktop-gnome, and just leave it
> in
> > place as long as
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:33:58AM -0400, Mike Holstein wrote:
> how challenging would it be to take the current ubuntustudio-desktop
> metapackge and rename it to ubuntustudio-desktop-gnome, and just leave it in
> place as long as gnome2 is around.
I haven't looked into the package depends in a l
how challenging would it be to take the current ubuntustudio-desktop
metapackge and rename it to ubuntustudio-desktop-gnome, and just leave it in
place as long as gnome2 is around. leave it basically as-is too, so no one
needs to maintain it. this might be a nice compromise. someone could install
u
