On Friday 04 January 2008 19:46:22 D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> On Friday 04 January 2008, Christopher Stamper wrote:
> > Rosegarden is for notation and MIDI, NOT audio. So it won't help at all.
> > (unless you wanted to record MIDI and not audio).
>
> I'm not sure what to make of this. Are you sa
On Friday 04 January 2008, Christopher Stamper wrote:
> Rosegarden is for notation and MIDI, NOT audio. So it won't help at all.
> (unless you wanted to record MIDI and not audio).
I'm not sure what to make of this. Are you saying that Rosegarden can't
record audio, or that its audio facilities
Thanks Tom!
On 1/4/08, thomas fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> http://lad.linuxaudio.org/index.html
> Tom
>
--
~holotone
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-us
On Friday 04 January 2008 11:53:34 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How important exactly is the interface in keeping XRUNs in check? With the
> proper configuration on any well endowed machine should I be able to
> synthesize without glitches regardless of interface? Also, could someone
> point me towar
I think the interface doesn't matter much, unless it (usb?) uses a lot of
cpu...
Of course, USB audio is not as good as firewire. But I think it should be
just fine.
On Jan 4, 2008 1:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How important exactly is the interface in keeping XRUNs in
How important exactly is the interface in keeping XRUNs in check? With the
proper configuration on any well endowed machine should I be able to
synthesize without glitches regardless of interface? Also, could someone
point me toward the LUA (?) archive?
Thanks!
~holotone
http://holotone.net
On 1
Hello, first post here, but a long-time audio engineer.
A friend of mine just got me started with Ardour. Honestly, I haven't
found anything not to like about it yet (except for a couple
non-standard edit aspects). It is very powerful and as far as I can
tell, it is as complete as I could expect i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thomas fisher schrieb:
>> On 1/3/08, Darrin Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
>>>
>>> What I would like to know are these two things:
>>> - is Ardour really all that better (over Audacity) when it comes to
>>> this sort of multi-tracking, or is ther
Maybe the same reason pro's use ProTools instead of MS SoundRecorder???
:-)
I suggest using and getting to know both Ardour and Audacity. And if, when
you're done, you still don't see why Ardour is better, then it probably
won't matter to you anyway. Use whatever you like best.
On Jan 4, 2008
I really don't understand what makes ardour an inevitable option Except the
automation a control and a few plugins Its all the same.Like I am a beginner
too.So please donoit misunderstandme for testing your awareness...Where is the
complexity..?
Best Regards,Bharani Prasanth Sure.
_
Nice! Thank you all for your input. It's evident to me that I just
need to spend some time learning to use Ardour. It sounds like a
great tool for multi-track recording.
Thanks!
- Darrin
On Jan 4, 2008 7:28 AM, Christopher Stamper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ardour is definitely the best. R
Ardour is definitely the best. Rosegarden is for notation and MIDI, NOT
audio. So it won't help at all. (unless you wanted to record MIDI and not
audio).
Audacity is more for the beginners, who don't really care about multiple
tracks, quality or control. It may have a couple nice features, but ove
12 matches
Mail list logo
