Re: Alternatives to using JACK

2009-12-01 Thread lrspares45
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 11:58 -0600, stereoplegic wrote: > Try installing the standard Ubuntu kernel. I've had issues w/ the RT > kernel since 8.10. Jack works fine for me w/o the RT kernel (YMMV, I'm > running w/ 3GB of RAM). > Well I'll be buggered sideways! It works perfectly! You are an absolute

Re: Alternatives to using JACK

2009-12-01 Thread Mac McIlvaine
At Tuesday, 1 December 2009, you wrote: >Audacity can work in a non-Jack mode and it's an excellent piece of >software. But without Jack, you're seriously limiting yourself since >most developers are going to want to use Jack when developing new and >existing projects. > >Perhaps a better (albeit

Re: Alternatives to using JACK

2009-12-01 Thread stereoplegic
Try installing the standard Ubuntu kernel. I've had issues w/ the RT kernel since 8.10. Jack works fine for me w/o the RT kernel (YMMV, I'm running w/ 3GB of RAM). On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 17:32 +, lrspares45 wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 08:49 -0800, Chris Reisor wrote: > > Audacity can work i

Re: Alternatives to using JACK

2009-12-01 Thread lrspares45
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 08:49 -0800, Chris Reisor wrote: > Audacity can work in a non-Jack mode and it's an excellent piece of > software. But without Jack, you're seriously limiting yourself since > most developers are going to want to use Jack when developing new and > existing projects. > > Perh

Re: Replacing Creox with Rakarrack in Ubuntu Studio

2009-12-01 Thread sdavmor
laurent.bellegarde wrote: > Scott Lavender a écrit : >> The Ubuntu Studio developers are considering replacing Creox with >> Rakarrack as a default application in Ubuntu Studio. >> >> Creox hasn't had any development in years while Rakarrack has seen >> development up through this year. >> >> Pleas

Re: Replacing Creox with Rakarrack in Ubuntu Studio

2009-12-01 Thread laurent.bellegarde
Scott Lavender a écrit : > The Ubuntu Studio developers are considering replacing Creox with > Rakarrack as a default application in Ubuntu Studio. > > Creox hasn't had any development in years while Rakarrack has seen > development up through this year. > > Please share your thoughts. Hi Scott, G

Re: Alternatives to using JACK

2009-12-01 Thread Chris Reisor
Audacity can work in a non-Jack mode and it's an excellent piece of software. But without Jack, you're seriously limiting yourself since most developers are going to want to use Jack when developing new and existing projects. Perhaps a better (albeit more difficult) option would be to work out yo

Alternatives to using JACK

2009-12-01 Thread lrspares45
Hi all, is there an alternative way to record guitar on Ubuntu that doesn't rely on JACK? I ask as I've spent two weeks trying to get JACK based apps running, and though I've managed to get it working twice, the next time I start the computer I effectively have to start all over again. This is no g

Re: Replacing Creox with Rakarrack in Ubuntu Studio

2009-12-01 Thread teza
Hi Olivier, guitarix is great, I've been in touch with Hermann, because I think it could better; It could actually become the "Studio Devil" of the free software,with a better graphique interface looking more like an amp, build with presets, a noise gate.. Regards Teza