Re: compiling dssi-vst in ubuntu karmic 9.10 x86_64 (was: Re: Ubuntu Audio Tweaks error)

2010-01-04 Thread Colectivo Sonidos Libertarios
Hi Pablo, Hi Teza! Thanks Pablo for the Spanish Guide, (aclara muchas cosas) and teza for the help (j apprecie aussi le continue interes pour partager tous types de nouvelle fonctionalité); i add the include line and the path for dssi and ladpsa in makefile and have a new error for make and

Re: compiling dssi-vst in ubuntu karmic 9.10 x86_64 (was: Re: Ubuntu Audio Tweaks error)

2010-01-04 Thread Pablo Fernandez
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Colectivo Sonidos Libertarios sonidoslibertar...@resist.ca wrote: Hi Pablo, Hi Teza! Thanks Pablo for the Spanish Guide, (aclara muchas cosas) and teza for the help (j apprecie aussi le continue interes pour partager tous types de nouvelle fonctionalité); i

Re: Ubuntu Audio Tweaks error

2010-01-03 Thread Colectivo Sonidos Libertarios
build by Sandie Sandgreen, Ubuntu Audio Tweaks who will be great to have in the next issue. You can test the soft here http://www.sandgreen.dk/index.php?side=python_uat Tell us what you think about. Amts Teza. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify

Re: Ubuntu Audio Tweaks error

2010-01-03 Thread teza
build by Sandie Sandgreen, Ubuntu Audio Tweaks who will be great to have in the next issue. You can test the soft here http://www.sandgreen.dk/index.php?side=python_uat Tell us what you think about. Amts Teza. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: compiling dssi-vst in ubuntu karmic 9.10 x86_64 (was: Re: Ubuntu Audio Tweaks error)

2010-01-03 Thread Pablo Fernandez
Hi, Camilo. My 2 cents; Follow Teza's directions but it could be that more problems arise. This dssi-vst should be easy to compile but it is a bit tricky. You should also check where the ladspa and dssi directories are and set the path in the Makefile so that you can use dssi-vst as wrapper,

Re: Ubuntu Audio Tweaks

2010-01-02 Thread Colectivo Sonidos Libertarios
good idea. But there'sanother soft build by Sandie Sandgreen, Ubuntu Audio Tweaks who will be great to have in the next issue. You can test the soft here http://www.sandgreen.dk/index.php?side=python_uat Tell us what you think about. Amts Teza. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list

Re: Ubuntu Audio Tweaks

2010-01-02 Thread teza
about having Raccarack in the next Ubuntu Studio Lucid instead Creox which is a very good idea. But there'sanother soft build by Sandie Sandgreen, Ubuntu Audio Tweaks who will be great to have in the next issue. You can test the soft here http://www.sandgreen.dk/index.php?side=python_uat

Ubuntu Audio Tweaks

2010-01-01 Thread teza
Hi all, fiew times ago we where talking about having Raccarack in the next Ubuntu Studio Lucid instead Creox which is a very good idea. But there'sanother soft build by Sandie Sandgreen, Ubuntu Audio Tweaks who will be great to have in the next issue. You can test the soft here http

Re: Ubuntu Audio Tweaks

2010-01-01 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:55 AM, teza tsalio...@orange.fr wrote: Hi all, fiew times ago we where talking about having Raccarack in the next Ubuntu Studio Lucid instead Creox which is a very good idea. But there'sanother soft build by Sandie Sandgreen, Ubuntu Audio Tweaks who will be great