aYo Binitie schrieb:
I have to say I've had the opposite experience. I'm actually tempted to
upgrade all my machines to Intrepid but for the fact that I love both
interfaces and would like to keep both. I'd be interested to know what you
have found buggy with Intrepid
- KDE4.1 is
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 19:57 -0800, Rafael Chacon wrote:
Canonical releases a new version of Ubuntu every six months. As each
new version, it is normal that the new version has fewer bugs than the
previous one (e.g. Windows 2008 has fewer bugs than Windows Vista).
Strongly disagree. I upgraded
I agree with Glenn. While the advantages to 'upgrading' are incremental,
the DOWNSIDE can be debilitating. 8.04 works with my Audigy 2
soundcard, 8.10 doesn't. And HAL doesn't see my mouse through
a KVM switch, so it modifies xorg.conf upon boot-up. After three
times, I plugged my 8.04 drive in,
*PLEASE* see how I have changed the topic to fit the discussion and
continue it under it. The current chat has nothing to do with the title.
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
FYI: RT kernel
ref: LAU list for today [ 01-04-2009 ]
thread: [PATCH] [RT] tasklets: fix typo in tasklet_hi_action
===
How soon this will manifest in Ubuntu, I do not know. However it was
significant enough that it solicited a triple thank you ! from CCRMA's
Fernando.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gregory Boehnlein wrote:
Has there been any progress on an RT kernel package for Intrepid? I've
pretty much stopped using Ubuntu Studio because of this..
There is no RT patch for 2.6.28 and 2.6.27 has issues. So you can
certainly build one
Of
Gregory Boehnlein
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 12:41 PM
To: 'Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion'
Subject: RE: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment
What's in Intrepid that's NOT in Hardy? (or 'Studio')
A much less buggy version of Ardour and several other packages for one
Brody McDonald wrote:
To all:
I can COMPLETELY appreciate all the good points made, and they do have merit.
Still, for the time being, there are just some things that make my life
easier in Windows.
And this is really the point. And what I personally advocate. Use what
works for you.
I
What's in Intrepid that's NOT in Hardy? (or 'Studio')
Since Studio is built on a LTS package (8.04), that's
enough support for the next few years. Plus it has RealTime.
If RT is that important to you, consider using it.
SkipF
Hull, Massachusetts
-- Original message
What's in Intrepid that's NOT in Hardy? (or 'Studio')
A much less buggy version of Ardour and several other packages for one, as
well as several updated Audio drivers that work w/ my hardware .
Since Studio is built on a LTS package (8.04), that's
enough support for the next few years. Plus
To: 'Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion'
Subject: RE: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment
What's in Intrepid that's NOT in Hardy? (or 'Studio')
A much less buggy version of Ardour and several other packages for one,
as
well as several updated Audio drivers that work w/ my hardware .
Since
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote:
snip
Was that on a 32-bit system or a 64-bit system?
32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Gustin Johnson gus...@echostar.ca wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote:
snip
- -
Any idea why?
Some googling mentioned nfs-kernel for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerhard Lang wrote:
Khashayar Naderehvandi schrieb:
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a proper build of hardy's kernel for intrepid,
using the source debs from hardy. I think kernel 2.6.24 has a problem
with gcc 4.3, giving me these errors:
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Gustin Johnson gus...@echostar.ca wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerhard Lang wrote:
Khashayar Naderehvandi schrieb:
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a proper build of hardy's kernel for intrepid,
using the source debs from hardy. I think
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a proper build of hardy's kernel for intrepid,
using the source debs from hardy. I think kernel 2.6.24 has a problem
with gcc 4.3, giving me these errors:
kernel/built-in.o: In function `timespec_add_ns':
/build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/include/linux/time.h:177: undefined
16 matches
Mail list logo