Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-08 Thread Hartmut Noack
aYo Binitie schrieb: I have to say I've had the opposite experience. I'm actually tempted to upgrade all my machines to Intrepid but for the fact that I love both interfaces and would like to keep both. I'd be interested to know what you have found buggy with Intrepid - KDE4.1 is

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-06 Thread Glenn Holmer
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 19:57 -0800, Rafael Chacon wrote: Canonical releases a new version of Ubuntu every six months. As each new version, it is normal that the new version has fewer bugs than the previous one (e.g. Windows 2008 has fewer bugs than Windows Vista). Strongly disagree. I upgraded

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-06 Thread SkipF
I agree with Glenn. While the advantages to 'upgrading' are incremental, the DOWNSIDE can be debilitating. 8.04 works with my Audigy 2 soundcard, 8.10 doesn't. And HAL doesn't see my mouse through a KVM switch, so it modifies xorg.conf upon boot-up. After three times, I plugged my 8.04 drive in,

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-06 Thread Cory K.
*PLEASE* see how I have changed the topic to fit the discussion and continue it under it. The current chat has nothing to do with the title. -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-05 Thread Thomas Fisher
FYI: RT kernel ref: LAU list for today [ 01-04-2009 ] thread: [PATCH] [RT] tasklets: fix typo in tasklet_hi_action === How soon this will manifest in Ubuntu, I do not know. However it was significant enough that it solicited a triple thank you ! from CCRMA's Fernando.

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-05 Thread Gustin Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gregory Boehnlein wrote: Has there been any progress on an RT kernel package for Intrepid? I've pretty much stopped using Ubuntu Studio because of this.. There is no RT patch for 2.6.28 and 2.6.27 has issues. So you can certainly build one

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-05 Thread Gustin Johnson
Of Gregory Boehnlein Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 12:41 PM To: 'Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion' Subject: RE: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment What's in Intrepid that's NOT in Hardy? (or 'Studio') A much less buggy version of Ardour and several other packages for one

Using what works (was: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment)

2009-01-05 Thread Cory K.
Brody McDonald wrote: To all: I can COMPLETELY appreciate all the good points made, and they do have merit. Still, for the time being, there are just some things that make my life easier in Windows. And this is really the point. And what I personally advocate. Use what works for you. I

RE: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-04 Thread SkipF
What's in Intrepid that's NOT in Hardy? (or 'Studio') Since Studio is built on a LTS package (8.04), that's enough support for the next few years. Plus it has RealTime. If RT is that important to you, consider using it. SkipF Hull, Massachusetts -- Original message

RE: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-04 Thread Gregory Boehnlein
What's in Intrepid that's NOT in Hardy? (or 'Studio') A much less buggy version of Ardour and several other packages for one, as well as several updated Audio drivers that work w/ my hardware . Since Studio is built on a LTS package (8.04), that's enough support for the next few years. Plus

RE: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-04 Thread Brody McDonald
To: 'Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion' Subject: RE: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment What's in Intrepid that's NOT in Hardy? (or 'Studio') A much less buggy version of Ardour and several other packages for one, as well as several updated Audio drivers that work w/ my hardware . Since

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-03 Thread Gustin Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote: snip Was that on a 32-bit system or a 64-bit system? 32 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-02 Thread Khashayar Naderehvandi
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Gustin Johnson gus...@echostar.ca wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote: snip - - Any idea why? Some googling mentioned nfs-kernel for

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-01 Thread Gustin Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerhard Lang wrote: Khashayar Naderehvandi schrieb: Hi all, I'm trying to make a proper build of hardy's kernel for intrepid, using the source debs from hardy. I think kernel 2.6.24 has a problem with gcc 4.3, giving me these errors:

Re: building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2009-01-01 Thread Khashayar Naderehvandi
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Gustin Johnson gus...@echostar.ca wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerhard Lang wrote: Khashayar Naderehvandi schrieb: Hi all, I'm trying to make a proper build of hardy's kernel for intrepid, using the source debs from hardy. I think

building 2.6.24 in an intrepid environment

2008-12-31 Thread Khashayar Naderehvandi
Hi all, I'm trying to make a proper build of hardy's kernel for intrepid, using the source debs from hardy. I think kernel 2.6.24 has a problem with gcc 4.3, giving me these errors: kernel/built-in.o: In function `timespec_add_ns': /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/include/linux/time.h:177: undefined