On 07/16/2013 11:33 AM, Peter Matulis wrote:
> Hi, I have created a blueprint [1] that affects the Ubuntu Server Guide
> development schedule. After several years of observation both Doug
> Smythies and I have decided it makes more sense to publish the Guide for
> LTS releases only. There would b
Hi,
Although I don't run a server myself, I really like this idea. Sticking
to stability saves us a lot of effort.
On 2013? 07? 16? 10:46, William Van Hevelingen wrote:
+1
I think this a great idea. I run all LTS servers and I often just look
at the most recent serverguide for up to date st
+1
I think this a great idea. I run all LTS servers and I often just look at
the most recent serverguide for up to date stuff because the LTS one is
usually missing 6+ months of fixes.
William
p.s
Any chance we can switch to Markdown or Restructed text? I've contributed a
few times before and I
On 07/16/2013 02:04 PM, Peter Matulis wrote:
> However, I'm supposed to be testing an XML client that
> might make peoples' lives easier. Do you feel like looking at it?:
>
> http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/
Ha, it's free to use but not open source. But maybe some other editor.
https://help.u
On 07/16/2013 01:46 PM, William Van Hevelingen wrote:
> +1
>
> I think this a great idea. I run all LTS servers and I often just look
> at the most recent serverguide for up to date stuff because the LTS one
> is usually missing 6+ months of fixes.
Thanks for your feedback William. The hope is t
Hi, I have created a blueprint [1] that affects the Ubuntu Server Guide
development schedule. After several years of observation both Doug
Smythies and I have decided it makes more sense to publish the Guide for
LTS releases only. There would be occasional (unofficial) publications
of the current
