I've noticed that - finding the Inspirons with Ubuntu installed is a
tortuous journey if you start off at www.dell.co.uk... mind you, at least
it's there if you look hard enough :)
Pete
On 10/09/2007, Mac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone who didn't see the Lifehacker article, here's Mark
Matthew Wild wrote:
On 9/8/07, *Josh Blacker* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Winning by quite a long way at the moment, leading over Debian by
about 600 votes :)
lol, now leading by 4000 votes :P
35 minutes after your post, I've just voted, and the lead is now
On 9/10/07, Pete Stean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that - finding the Inspirons with Ubuntu installed is a
tortuous journey if you start off at www.dell.co.uk... mind you, at least
it's there if you look hard enough :)
Pete
Yep. Trying to help someone order one... embarrassing
Now at over 10K :)
Pete
On 10/09/2007, Mark Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Wild wrote:
On 9/8/07, *Josh Blacker* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Winning by quite a long way at the moment, leading over Debian by
about 600 votes :)
lol, now
Mac wrote:
Add your vote to the Lenovo blog:
http://lenovoblogs.com/insidethebox/?p=98
Mac
I didn't vote for Ubuntu. I voted for:
Anyone that refuses to carry binary-only drivers, so that all others
will also benefit, as it will require documented hardware
For the reasons it stipulates!
Hi,
There's a screencast team meeting in #ubuntu-meeting ON irc at 8pm UK
time (19:00 UTC) today. I'd appreciate it if anyone who has any comments
to make about the Month Of Screencasts [0], the agenda [1] or anything
else Ubuntu-Screencast-related, please attend, or if you cannot attend
feel
Alan, I know this is 'fluff' but perhaps something on compiz-fusion and
demos on how to initiate the new plugins such as Expo and Shift (? if that's
the name - the new iTunes album art type thing) . The problem with most
screencasts is that they're of such low resolution and so badly encoded that
On 10/09/2007, Alan Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 11:00 +0100, Mark Harrison wrote:
Hardware load balancer tend to give the twin
benefits of resilience and performance.
..and another single point of failure. :)
Maybe that's why he said (pair) of load balancers? :-)
Alan Pope wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 11:00 +0100, Mark Harrison wrote:
Hardware load balancer tend to give the twin
benefits of resilience and performance.
..and another single point of failure. :)
Cheers,
Al.
Al,
Yeah - that's why I've (in the past) used a
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 21:28 +0100, Mark Harrison wrote:
Others may have a different opinion, and if they're prepared to
underwrite (with funds lodged in an escrow account) my company's loss of
income were we to have any downtime because of an Ubuntu failure, I'm
willing to read
Cheers Mark
One question though. I've seen on the various clustering projects that they
all offer a type of load balancing so why not go for a software solution as
opposed to a hardware one?
Nevertheless, thanks for answering my question.
E
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan Pope wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 21:28 +0100, Mark Harrison wrote:
Others may have a different opinion, and if they're prepared to
underwrite (with funds lodged in an escrow account) my company's loss of
income were we to have any downtime because of an Ubuntu failure,
Hmm Ok, that fairly well answers my post of a couple of minutes ago.
My only comment to the software load balancing, compensation clauses being
pushed out of sight for the moment, is that there are a number of clusters
out there run by various companies blah blah blah and they seem to use the
13 matches
Mail list logo
