On 6 June 2011 15:57, gazz wrote:
>
> Ah, dunno, haven't actually looked at Gnome 3 yet . . . if it's as bad as
> Unity - eeek!
Unity is a /lot/ more like traditional GNOME 2 than GNOME 3 is.
Put in the time to learn Unity. It is a pretty decent GUI, honestly. I
don't understand why people are w
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 17:12 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> On 08/06/2011 16:24, Grant Sewell wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:10 PM, J Fernyhough wrote:
> >> On 8 June 2011 11:00, Jon Reynolds wrote:
> >>> My dad uses Windows and recently it completely crashed and the local
> >>> comput
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 17:12 +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> The major problem (IMHO) in using Linux instead of Windows for
> ordinary
> users, is the difficulty with Office 2007 and 2010 documents, which
> are
> becoming more and more
> Email and web browsing is dead easy - it's the incompa
On 08/06/2011 17:25, Matthew Daubney wrote:
Problem with OOXML is that it has incompatibilities between versions
of MS Office... if MS can't make compatibility with their own products
work, other people have very little chance!
Absolutely. Plenty of posts on the MS Answers forum from people who
On 8 June 2011 17:12, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
> The major problem (IMHO) in using Linux instead of Windows for ordinary
> users, is the difficulty with Office 2007 and 2010 documents, which are
> becoming more and more
> Email and web browsing is dead easy - it's the incompatibilities of OOX
On 08/06/2011 16:24, Grant Sewell wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:10 PM, J Fernyhough wrote:
On 8 June 2011 11:00, Jon Reynolds wrote:
My dad uses Windows and recently it completely crashed and the local
computer shop said it needed reinstalling. So he lost all his programs.
Just maddened
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:10 PM, J Fernyhough wrote:
> On 8 June 2011 11:00, Jon Reynolds wrote:
>> My dad uses Windows and recently it completely crashed and the local
>> computer shop said it needed reinstalling. So he lost all his programs.
>>
> >
>> Just maddened me a bit because he was willin
On 08/06/11 10:39, Paul Sutton wrote:
Hi
Are there any distributions that set up a lamp server out of the box
something similar to this i guess
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=lamppix
but lamppix is no longer maintained
it needs to be EASY TO SET UP as in for non linux experts i
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:47 +0100, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
> a FOSS alternative to cpanel is ISPConfig
Erm not according to ISP hosting Providers they all want Cpanel but I
understand that ISPConfig is improving.
Ubuntu server is fantastic. If you use the last LTS 10.04.2 then you'll
get a lamp s
I would recommend CentOS - it has an extremely simple web interface for
configuration.
Hth,
Bodsda
--Original Message--
From: Paul Sutton
Sender: ubuntu-uk-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
To: Ubuntu-Uk
ReplyTo: Ubuntu-Uk
Subject: [ubuntu-uk] LAMP SERVER DISTRIBUTIONS
Sent: 8 Jun 2011 10:39
Hi
On 8 June 2011 11:00, Jon Reynolds wrote:
> My dad uses Windows and recently it completely crashed and the local
> computer shop said it needed reinstalling. So he lost all his programs.
>
> Just maddened me a bit because he was willing to try free software... just
> didn't have enough willingnes
a FOSS alternative to cpanel is ISPConfig
Jacob Mansfield
Programmer
CyberKing Solutions™
www.cyberkingsolutions.co.uk - I do know the database is down
Air conditioned environment - do not open windows!
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-w
My dad uses Windows and recently it completely crashed and the local
computer shop said it needed reinstalling. So he lost all his programs.
He decided he was going to try OpenOffice, which I thought was great. I
also pointed out Libre office to him.
But unfortunately the outcome was that Ope
On 8 June 2011 10:39, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Hi
>
> Are there any distributions that set up a lamp server out of the box
> something similar to this i guess
> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=lamppix
>
> but lamppix is no longer maintained
>
> it needs to be EASY TO SET UP as in for
On 8 June 2011 10:39, Paul Sutton wrote:
> Are there any distributions that set up a lamp server out of the box
> something similar to this i guess
Uhm, Ubuntu?
> i am sure the old red hat distributions had a screen that allowed users to
> choose the type of system being installed so selecting w
Hi
Are there any distributions that set up a lamp server out of the box
something similar to this i guess
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=lamppix
but lamppix is no longer maintained
it needs to be EASY TO SET UP as in for non linux experts i can do
stuff but prefer a menu or
Silly me forgot the link!
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/229187/30_days_withubuntu_linux.html
30 Days With Ubuntu Linux
By Tony Bradley, PCWorld
@TheTonyBradley
On 6/8/11, Andrés Muñiz Piniella wrote:
> I've been following up 7 days of this guy fighting a change to Ubuntu
> from
I've been following up 7 days of this guy fighting a change to Ubuntu
from Windows7.
Sadly he is finding loads of contradictory messages, rants about
linux, rants about mint, rants about nvidia drivers...
But a very interesting read. Linux foundation is retweeting every
single blogpost.
--
Andr
18 matches
Mail list logo
