-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Greenwood wrote:
> I'm not sure that's right. A license will stop you using it legally,
> you don't need DRM for that.
> You use DRM to enforce the license.
In the grand scheme of things, DRM as it currently exists is too
pathetic to be considered
On 01/02/07, Daniel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andy wrote:
> > Software DRM works only on the assumption that one can not determine
> > how the "authorised" program works. You can do that just as easily on
> > Linux, just compile the code, yes it can be reverse engineered but you
> > coul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy wrote:
> Its not hard to make a DRM scheme for Linux, why does the OS even
> matter? C/C++/Java/Python code is portable, or do they want to use
> .NET or something?
Even then there's Mono, so it wouldn't be entirely impossible.
> Software DRM wor
On 01/02/07, Paul Brunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that means the BBC will have to come up with some
> sort of DRM for Linux if we want to use the service.
Well they don't need to come up with a secure DRM scheme as they don't
have one of those for Windows either, (one could argue that a secure
Filled it in but after reading a bit more it looks like the trust is
saying that the BBC have to provide something for Linux and mac. But
they're also saying that the content can be kept for no more then 30
days(not the 13weeks that the BBC proposed)..that means the BBC will
have to come up wit
