On 11 October 2010 19:40, Traveller wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 11:29, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 08:14:14PM +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
>>>
>>> Whoa! Hold it! Stop the world!
>>>
>>> I have not seen any message from John Matthews with the Subject of
>>> "Pages not loading in Ubun
try chromium-browser
Jacob Mansfield
Programmer
On 11 October 2010 11:58, John Matthews wrote:
> On 11/10/10 11:41, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
> > sudo apt-get purge google-chrome
> > sudo apt-get install google-chrome
> > Jacob Mansfield
> > Programmer
>
> Did the purge, it worked, but cant insta
On 11 October 2010 11:58, John Matthews wrote:
> On 11/10/10 11:41, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
>> sudo apt-get purge google-chrome
>> sudo apt-get install google-chrome
>> Jacob Mansfield
>> Programmer
>
> Did the purge, it worked, but cant install, no google chrome to install.
> looked in Synaptic, n
On 11/10/10 11:41, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
> sudo apt-get purge google-chrome
> sudo apt-get install google-chrome
> Jacob Mansfield
> Programmer
Did the purge, it worked, but cant install, no google chrome to install.
looked in Synaptic, not there. Where is the official site for google
chrome fo
sudo apt-get purge google-chrome
sudo apt-get install google-chrome
Jacob Mansfield
Programmer
On 11 October 2010 11:31, John Matthews wrote:
> On 11/10/10 11:17, Colin Law wrote:
> > Google for google chrome profile yields many hits, alternatively
> > you could uninstall and purge google-
On 11 October 2010 11:31, John Matthews wrote:
> On 11/10/10 11:17, Colin Law wrote:
>> Google for google chrome profile yields many hits, alternatively
>> you could uninstall and purge google-chrome and re-install it. That
>> should clear the settings (in ~/.config/google-chrome I think).
>>
On 11/10/10 11:17, Colin Law wrote:
> Google for google chrome profile yields many hits, alternatively
> you could uninstall and purge google-chrome and re-install it. That
> should clear the settings (in ~/.config/google-chrome I think).
>
> Colin
I did google above, and it was mainly about
On 11 October 2010 10:56, John Matthews wrote:
> Problem is now, how do I set up a new profile in Chrome. I am now
> getting a message when I start this version saying
>
> 'Your profile cannot be used because it is from a newer version of
> Google Chrome. Some features may be unavailable. Plea
Problem is now, how do I set up a new profile in Chrome. I am now
getting a message when I start this version saying
'Your profile cannot be used because it is from a newer version of
Google Chrome. Some features may be unavailable. Please specify a
different profile directory or use a newe
On 11/10/10 10:27, Colin Law wrote:
> I still don't know which version of google-chrome you are using.
>
> Colin
Working, it was the Chrome version, had the unstable version installed.
Sorry I didnt notice your post about the version I was using. As soon as
you mentioned version, and when I saw
On 11 October 2010 10:24, John Matthews wrote:
> On 11/10/10 09:45, Sean Miller wrote:
>> Unsupported proprietary plug-ins, perhaps?
>>
>> Sean
>
>
> Spoke too soon, the page disappeared, but took longer to go than with
> the plug-ins. :( So its not the plug-ins.
I still don't know which version
Is there a way using the terminal or an error report in Ubuntu, that
might show why it wont stay in view?
John
--
Ubuntu User #30817
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
On 11/10/10 09:45, Sean Miller wrote:
> Unsupported proprietary plug-ins, perhaps?
>
> Sean
Spoke too soon, the page disappeared, but took longer to go than with
the plug-ins. :( So its not the plug-ins.
John
--
Ubuntu User #30817
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail
On 11/10/10 09:40, Roy Jamison wrote:
> Actually if p...@home staff are anything to go by, I wouldn't exactly
> expect their website to be any good.
> Think..."mass breeding at the sibling level" with the rabbits and other
> animals they sell. Most of them die within 2 years because of health
> pro
On 11/10/10 09:45, Sean Miller wrote:
> Unsupported proprietary plug-ins, perhaps?
>
> Sean
Your right, I just disabled all my plugins for Google Chrome, and the
page renders. So I will now go through and check which one it was. First
time I have known that to happen with Chrome. That is interes
On 11/10/10 09:28, Sean Miller wrote:
> If the petsathome site is completely awful HTML then that's rather a
> sad reflection on their brand... who is to know whether the pet food
> is edible, the fish being sold healthy or the staff knowledgable if
> they can't be bothered to spend at least a few
On 11 October 2010 09:42, John Matthews wrote:
> If that is the cawse, why is it some people can view it in the same
> versions of Ubuntu and the FF and Chrome, and I cant as is being pointed
> out here.
Unsupported proprietary plug-ins, perhaps?
Sean
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
On 11/10/10 07:58, Colin Law wrote:
> It is not his own site, his initial question was worded slightly
> ambiguously. He said that he 'had a page' that failed, but did not
> mean that it was his own site.
>
> But you are right that the fundamental problem may be the invalid
> html. The new version
Actually if p...@home staff are anything to go by, I wouldn't exactly
expect their website to be any good.
Think..."mass breeding at the sibling level" with the rabbits and other
animals they sell. Most of them die within 2 years because of health
problems like cancer, deformations, etc.
Source: C
On 11/10/10 07:32, Sean Miller wrote:
> Surely this is all "back to front"?
>
> If the HTML is rubbish, and newer versions of the rendering engines
> are throwing it out, perhaps the key would be to work out WHY they are
> creating blank sites and fix your own site?
>
> Then you end up with a bonus
On 11 October 2010 07:58, Colin Law wrote:
> It is not his own site, his initial question was worded slightly
> ambiguously. He said that he 'had a page' that failed, but did not
> mean that it was his own site.
Ah, apologies... mis-read.
> But you are right that the fundamental problem may be t
On 11 October 2010 07:32, Sean Miller wrote:
> Surely this is all "back to front"?
>
> If the HTML is rubbish, and newer versions of the rendering engines
> are throwing it out, perhaps the key would be to work out WHY they are
> creating blank sites and fix your own site?
It is not his own site,
Surely this is all "back to front"?
If the HTML is rubbish, and newer versions of the rendering engines
are throwing it out, perhaps the key would be to work out WHY they are
creating blank sites and fix your own site?
Then you end up with a bonus - you have a site that OTHERS with newer
browsers
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 18:19 +0100, John Matthews wrote:
> So how do I get over it. It wont load, its not the only page, but that
> is one I use the most.
The page loads fine for me on Firefox 3.6.12pre and Firefox 4.0b8pre
both on Ubuntu 10.10 so it may be a problem with Chromium. Then again, I
j
On 10/10/10 19:21, John Matthews wrote:
> How can I go back to 3.6.10, and how can I get Chrome to show those pages.
>
> John
>
3.6.10 of what? Firefox?
Looks like Firefox is 3.6.10 in Ubuntu 10.10 (and 10.04.1).
As far as fixing the problem, I've posted some links to Launchpad so you
can rais
On 10/10/10 19:06, John Matthews wrote:
> On 10/10/10 19:00, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
>> try in firefox, what happens?
>> Jacob Mansfield
>> Programmer
> That works, I'm running 3.6.10 on my netbook, so its a problem with
> Google and the new version of FF. So what has changed in the upgrade to
> 10.
On 10/10/10 18:07, John Matthews wrote:
> I am having similar problems to the gentlman with the bank page. I have
> animals, and have a page called www.petsathome.com which I was able to
> get on till I got the upgrade to beta last week. I use Google Chrome,
> and it worked ok till then. Now, the p
Renders in Google Chrome stable, but not in the current Chromium unstable,
so you could try installing Chrome.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
, 2010 19:18:31
>Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Pages not loading in Ubuntu 10.10
>
>It's probably a difference in the way the HTML renderers work. I know FF uses
>Gecko but i don't know about chromium
>Jacob Mansfield
>Programmer
>
>
>
>
>
--
ubun
How can I go back to 3.6.10, and how can I get Chrome to show those pages.
John
--
Ubuntu User #30817
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
It's probably a difference in the way the HTML renderers work. I know FF
uses Gecko but i don't know about chromium
Jacob Mansfield
Programmer
On 10 October 2010 19:06, John Matthews wrote:
> On 10/10/10 19:00, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
> > try in firefox, what happens?
> > Jacob Mansfield
> > Pr
On 10/10/10 19:00, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
> try in firefox, what happens?
> Jacob Mansfield
> Programmer
That works, I'm running 3.6.10 on my netbook, so its a problem with
Google and the new version of FF. So what has changed in the upgrade to
10.10 to make that happen, that is annoying. I hate
try in firefox, what happens?
Jacob Mansfield
Programmer
On 10 October 2010 18:59, John Matthews wrote:
> Just started my netbook, running 10.10 as well, and it wont open on
> there using Chrome either, so it isnt just the pc, its the netbook as
> well that has a problem.
>
> John
>
> --
> Ubu
Just started my netbook, running 10.10 as well, and it wont open on
there using Chrome either, so it isnt just the pc, its the netbook as
well that has a problem.
John
--
Ubuntu User #30817
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu
On 10/10/10 18:26, Rob Beard wrote:
> I've got the same problem on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS running Chromium 8.0.551.0
> (62097) (it's a nightly build I believe). I have seen it with a couple
> of web sites.
>
> I tried the Pets At Home web site in Firefox 3.6.10 and it works fine,
> so I suspect rather t
On 10/10/10 18:20, Colin Law wrote:
> Is that your web site? It is full of html errors, see
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.petsathome.com
>
> Colin
>
Hi, no its not my website. Up till the upgrade, it worked no problems.
As I said I viewed it a lot.
On 10/10/10 18:26, Rob Beard wrote:
On 10/10/10 18:07, John Matthews wrote:
> I am having similar problems to the gentlman with the bank page. I have
> animals, and have a page called www.petsathome.com which I was able to
> get on till I got the upgrade to beta last week. I use Google Chrome,
> and it worked ok till then. Now, the p
On 10 October 2010 18:07, John Matthews wrote:
> I am having similar problems to the gentlman with the bank page. I have
> animals, and have a page called www.petsathome.com which I was able to
> get on till I got the upgrade to beta last week. I use Google Chrome,
> and it worked ok till then. No
So how do I get over it. It wont load, its not the only page, but that
is one I use the most.
John
On 10/10/10 18:10, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
> seems fine to me, by the sound of what you said I would guess that
> it's a css style sheet problem
> Jacob Mansfield
> Programmer
--
Ubuntu User #30
seems fine to me, by the sound of what you said I would guess that it's a
css style sheet problem
Jacob Mansfield
Programmer
On 10 October 2010 18:07, John Matthews wrote:
> I am having similar problems to the gentlman with the bank page. I have
> animals, and have a page called www.petsathome
I am having similar problems to the gentlman with the bank page. I have
animals, and have a page called www.petsathome.com which I was able to
get on till I got the upgrade to beta last week. I use Google Chrome,
and it worked ok till then. Now, the page loads, and goes white after a
couple of
41 matches
Mail list logo