On Wednesday, 28.02.2007 at 22:11 +, Benjamin Webb wrote:
> I thought I'd point out
> http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page11077.asp , the response to the
> petition to stop software patents. Apparently software patents are
> already illegal in the UK.
>
> Does this mean that it is legal fo
On 28/02/07, Benjamin Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently software patents are
> already illegal in the UK.
Well according to the patent office the following is not patentable:
> (c) a scheme, rule or method for performing
> a mental act, playing a game or doing
> business, or a
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 22:48 +, gord wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 22:11 +, Benjamin Webb wrote:
> > I thought I'd point out
> > http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page11077.asp , the response to the
> > petition to stop software patents. Apparently software patents are
> > already illegal
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 22:11 +, Benjamin Webb wrote:
> I thought I'd point out
> http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page11077.asp , the response to the
> petition to stop software patents. Apparently software patents are
> already illegal in the UK.
>
> Does this mean that it is legal for us to
Don't believe you can patent an algorithm either.
On 28 Feb 2007, at 22:11, Benjamin Webb wrote:
> I thought I'd point out
> http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page11077.asp , the response to the
> petition to stop software patents. Apparently software patents are
> already illegal in the UK.
>
I thought I'd point out
http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page11077.asp , the response to the
petition to stop software patents. Apparently software patents are
already illegal in the UK.
Does this mean that it is legal for us to install MP3 codecs
(including using automatix) or are these patente
