All i mean is if you dont know whats happening in the back end and dont
have a good enough undersdtanding to set it up manually then dont use a
gui, purely for something as major as that but dont mean something as
simple as burning cds etc.
Regards,
Daniel
andylockran wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP S
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:28:44AM +0100, Dave Morley wrote:
> Popey I got to see you say that to bigron ;)
I've got a year to get my muscles built up before I say it to him at LRL 09
:)
Cheers,
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Lamb wrote:
> To be fair the same could be said about any gui, like ebox as well, if
> you cant do it manually and know what your doing then dont use something
> like webmin or ebox, because if it doesnt work then you do need to know
> what y
To be fair the same could be said about any gui, like ebox as well, if
you cant do it manually and know what your doing then dont use something
like webmin or ebox, because if it doesnt work then you do need to know
what your doing.
Daniel
Dave Morley wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:00 +0100,
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:00 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:09:05PM +0100, Johnathon Tinsley wrote:
> > You might find this thread helpful:
> > http://groups.google.com/group/coloco/browse_thread/thread/321fcdaecde25b44
> >
> > Has one of your devs talking in it...
> >
>
> F
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:09:05PM +0100, Johnathon Tinsley wrote:
> You might find this thread helpful:
> http://groups.google.com/group/coloco/browse_thread/thread/321fcdaecde25b44
>
> Has one of your devs talking in it...
>
>From that thread:-
"P.S.
If you're using WebMin you probably should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Westby wrote:
| On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 21:17 +0100, Johnathon Tinsley wrote:
|> Its absence is deliberate, and its not licensing related. Webmin plays
|> with the config files of programs it alters in nasty ways. I don't know
|> the specifics, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Westby wrote:
| On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 21:17 +0100, Johnathon Tinsley wrote:
|> Its absence is deliberate, and its not licensing related. Webmin plays
|> with the config files of programs it alters in nasty ways. I don't know
|> the specifics, but
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 21:17 +0100, Johnathon Tinsley wrote:
> Its absence is deliberate, and its not licensing related. Webmin plays
> with the config files of programs it alters in nasty ways. I don't know
> the specifics, but both Ubuntu & Debian refuse to package it.
Hi,
I think Alan is more c
Johnathon Tinsley wrote:
> Its absence is deliberate, and its not licensing related. Webmin plays
> with the config files of programs it alters in nasty ways. I don't know
> the specifics, but both Ubuntu & Debian refuse to package it.
Mmm... Are you sure? I'd be grateful if you could suggest whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Pope wrote:
| On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 09:17:10PM +0100, Johnathon Tinsley wrote:
|> Its absence is deliberate, and its not licensing related. Webmin plays
|> with the config files of programs it alters in nasty ways. I don't know
|> the specifics,
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 09:17:10PM +0100, Johnathon Tinsley wrote:
> Its absence is deliberate, and its not licensing related. Webmin plays
> with the config files of programs it alters in nasty ways. I don't know
> the specifics, but both Ubuntu & Debian refuse to package it.
>
O RLY? Where'd yo
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:41:33PM +0100, Mac wrote:
> OK. So it wasn't that you discovered a serious problem. Phew! :-)
>
Well... there's that as well ;)
> (Do you think its absence from the Debian/Ubuntu repos is 'cos it's
> released under a BSD licence and not GPL?)
>
I believe that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
|>>
|> I dunno really, I just stopped using it back in the days of redhat 7,
and
|> have never touched it since. I guess that since it's not been
packaged in
|> Ubuntu or Debian for a long time meant I just didn't think fo using
it. I
|> kinda a
Alan Pope wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:37:42PM +0100, Mac wrote:
>> Alan Pope wrote:
>> > Do people actually still use webmin?
>>
>> Al >>> I've been thinking of using it; is that not a sensible thing to
>> do? How come?
>>
>
> I dunno really, I just stopped using it back in the days o
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:37:42PM +0100, Mac wrote:
> Alan Pope wrote:
> > Do people actually still use webmin?
>
> Al >>> I've been thinking of using it; is that not a sensible thing to
> do? How come?
>
I dunno really, I just stopped using it back in the days of redhat 7, and
have never t
Alan Pope wrote:
> Do people actually still use webmin?
Al >>> I've been thinking of using it; is that not a sensible thing to
do? How come?
Mac
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
I do, all my servers run it and monitoring is done via it,
I find it alot better than ebox currently, however ebox does look promising.
I know some people are anti webmin however I do find it brilliant.
Regards,
Daniel
Alan Pope wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:23:37AM +0100, Daniel Lamb wr
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:23:37AM +0100, Daniel Lamb wrote:
> Webmin does monitor software raid.
>
> Worth having a quick look at it.
>
Do people actually still use webmin?
Cheers,
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/U
19 matches
Mail list logo
