On Tue, 31 May 2011 22:14:37 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
No, I did not miss that, but I do not fully understand. By
suggesting
that Unity is the Frankenstein character are you suggesting that
Unity *creates* a monster? I thought you meant that you feel Unity
*is* the monster lacking humanity.
On 30 May 2011 22:09, suprengr boo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am beginning to wonder if Unity is the Frankenstein character of
Ubuntu. It's alive they shouted - but did 'they' consider the
humanity of it all? ;)
Frankenstein was the creator of the monster, not the monster itself.
Colin
--
On 31/05/11 21:23, Colin Law wrote:
On 30 May 2011 22:09, suprengr boo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am beginning to wonder if Unity is the Frankenstein character of
Ubuntu. It's alive they shouted - but did 'they' consider the
humanity of it all? ;)
Frankenstein was the creator of the monster,
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 21:37 +0100, Paul Sutton wrote:
On 31/05/11 21:23, Colin Law wrote:
On 30 May 2011 22:09, suprengr boo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am beginning to wonder if Unity is the Frankenstein character of
Ubuntu. It's alive they shouted - but did 'they' consider the
humanity of it
On 31 May 2011 21:52, suprengr boo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 21:37 +0100, Paul Sutton wrote:
On 31/05/11 21:23, Colin Law wrote:
On 30 May 2011 22:09, suprengr boo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am beginning to wonder if Unity is the Frankenstein character of
Ubuntu. It's alive
I am beginning to wonder if Unity is the Frankenstein character of
Ubuntu. It's alive they shouted - but did 'they' consider the
humanity of it all? ;)
Cheers,
SuprEngr.
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
--
