Jono Bacon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> To those of you who don't know me, I am Jono Bacon and I am the Ubuntu
> Community Manager, now residing in the Easy Bay in sunny California. :-)
>
> Aside from just being part of the team, I have also been helping to
> resolve some conflict that has been happening
I would vote to somehow establish framework for what
we are all accomplishing. Sort of a bullet itemized prioritized
list of things the group wishes to get done.
That way whomever is deemed in charge works towards the list
and who's leadership and accomplishments are measured
against a pre-set.
ornia
Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-US-CA] Asking For Opinion: Leadership Appointment Process
I apologize for voting. I didn't know you had to be a Mo-Betta to vote.
I agree, there should be some by laws. As mention in this reply, you
don't get a vote unless you are a member of a special group
Just a quick response to Robert:
Jack:
> I agree with you that a set of bylaws would go a long way towards
> fixing the problems I outlined above. I agree with most of your
> proposal, though as I mentioned above, I have reservations about using
> Launchpad membership as a definition of who is eli
On 03/09/2010 10:24 AM, David Wondelry ~DarkwingDuck~ wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 07:58 AM, David Wondelry ~DarkwingDuck~ wrote:
>> On 03/09/2010 12:44 AM, Jono Bacon wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I just want to clarify my original question as there was a little
>>> confusion reported to me earlier: I am
I apologize for voting. I didn't know you had to be a Mo-Betta to vote.
I agree, there should be some by laws. As mention in this reply, you
don't get a vote unless you are a member of a special group. Is that
like only landed gentry have a vote? Does this work like everyone gets
a vote, but no
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Jono Bacon wrote:
>
> I just want to clarify my original question as there was a little
> confusion reported to me earlier: I am asking whether you feel that the
> leadership process is required at all. If you feel the team would
> benefit from having that process
On 03/09/2010 02:31 PM, Robert Wall wrote:
> -1. While I'm glad that we've gotten to the point that we can sanely
> have this discussion, I disagree with Jono's proposal for similar
> reasons to David and Jack:
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:24 AM, David Wondelry ~DarkwingDuck~
> wrote:
>> This is
-1. While I'm glad that we've gotten to the point that we can sanely
have this discussion, I disagree with Jono's proposal for similar
reasons to David and Jack:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:24 AM, David Wondelry ~DarkwingDuck~
wrote:
> This is why I feel this course of action is like a very small b
Hi all,
I generally agree with what DW said (though the characterization of the
SoCal/NoCal mentality may be a bit simplified...). I have always been of
the opinion that the issues and personal problems in this group derive from
a lack of a well-defined and fair structure/by-laws. A couple month
+1
On 3/8/2010 9:23 PM, Jono Bacon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> To those of you who don't know me, I am Jono Bacon and I am the Ubuntu
> Community Manager, now residing in the Easy Bay in sunny California. :-)
>
> Aside from just being part of the team, I have also been helping to
> resolve some conflict
On 03/09/2010 07:58 AM, David Wondelry ~DarkwingDuck~ wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 12:44 AM, Jono Bacon wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I just want to clarify my original question as there was a little
>> confusion reported to me earlier: I am asking whether you feel that the
>> leadership process is required
Jono Bacon writes:
> Hi All,
>
> I just want to clarify my original question as there was a little
> confusion reported to me earlier: I am asking whether you feel that the
> leadership process is required at all. If you feel the team would
> benefit from having that process in place, vote with
On 03/09/2010 12:44 AM, Jono Bacon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just want to clarify my original question as there was a little
> confusion reported to me earlier: I am asking whether you feel that the
> leadership process is required at all. If you feel the team would
> benefit from having that proc
It seem that this particular situation requires a leadership process, and
the one proposed is sound.
+1
Larry Cafiero
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Jono Bacon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just want to clarify my original question as there was a little
> confusion reported to me earlier: I am aski
Hi All,
I just want to clarify my original question as there was a little
confusion reported to me earlier: I am asking whether you feel that the
leadership process is required at all. If you feel the team would
benefit from having that process in place, vote with +1, if you feel
that the team
> * +1 - you agree with the above proposal.
+1
Jono, thank you for taking the time to work with us and outline this process.
I hope everyone takes a moment to expresses their opinion to Jono
privately or on the list.
Grant Bowman
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam
--
Ubuntu-us-ca maili
Seems fair to me. +1
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 21:23 -0800, Jono Bacon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> To those of you who don't know me, I am Jono Bacon and I am the Ubuntu
> Community Manager, now residing in the Easy Bay in sunny California. :-)
>
> Aside from just being part of the team, I have also been
+1 for me.
-Original Message-
Date: Monday, March 08, 2010 9:23:43 pm
To: ubuntu-us-ca@lists.ubuntu.com
From: "Jono Bacon"
Subject: [Ubuntu-US-CA] Asking For Opinion: Leadership Appointment Process
Hi All,
To those of you who don't know me, I am Jono Bacon and I am the Ub
hi,
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Jono Bacon wrote:
>* +1 - you agree with the above proposal.
>
+1
--
Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list
Ubuntu-us-ca@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca
Hi All,
To those of you who don't know me, I am Jono Bacon and I am the Ubuntu
Community Manager, now residing in the Easy Bay in sunny California. :-)
Aside from just being part of the team, I have also been helping to
resolve some conflict that has been happening in the team. I have had
some
21 matches
Mail list logo
