On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Robert Wall wrote:
>> n Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Grant Bowman wrote:
>>> Is the WTFPL really the most appropriate?
>>
>> In my opinion, yes. It accurately conveys the restrictions I wanted to
>> put on C
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Robert Wall wrote:
> n Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Grant Bowman wrote:
>> Is the WTFPL really the most appropriate?
>
> In my opinion, yes. It accurately conveys the restrictions I wanted to
> put on CD sleeve licensing (read: none), while avoiding overly
> lega
n Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Grant Bowman wrote:
> Is the WTFPL really the most appropriate?
In my opinion, yes. It accurately conveys the restrictions I wanted to
put on CD sleeve licensing (read: none), while avoiding overly
legalistic language. It's on the list of FSF free licenses (
http:/
We only have two days left.
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-california
Is the WTFPL really the most appropriate? Is the scale8x version what
you currently recommend? Would anyone like to help get something
ready from these sources that has the new branding and colors?
Grant Bowman
https://w
