Re: [Ubuntu-US-CA] Ubuntu Tri-Fold Source Files

2010-03-28 Thread Jack Deslippe
Thanks for comments everyone - I also got a lot of comments from the folks at the jam. I intended to update the screenshots and marketing to fit with lucid today ( as Nathan suggested ) but got side tracked by other goings-on. I'll send a new draft out in a couple days. Ill remove snes9x as well

Re: [Ubuntu-US-CA] Ubuntu Tri-Fold Source Files

2010-03-28 Thread Aaditya Bhatia
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Nathan Haines wrote: > On 03/28/2010 01:20 PM, Aaditya Bhatia wrote: >> We don't execute every file on sight, so we're virus-proof by design, >> at least in this sense. Might sound a little complicated for a newbie, >> but doesn't this point deserve a mention? >> >

Re: [Ubuntu-US-CA] Ubuntu Tri-Fold Source Files

2010-03-28 Thread Nathan Haines
On 03/28/2010 01:20 PM, Aaditya Bhatia wrote: > We don't execute every file on sight, so we're virus-proof by design, > at least in this sense. Might sound a little complicated for a newbie, > but doesn't this point deserve a mention? > > It deserves a mention but only in an accurate way. Most

Re: [Ubuntu-US-CA] Ubuntu Tri-Fold Source Files

2010-03-28 Thread Nathan Haines
I was going to point out everything that Mark did (except I didn't catch "networs", good job). To be honest, I can't tell what's changed from before. I know the hardest part of doing something like this is figuring out what should be there and getting it written and able to fit. So I think

Re: [Ubuntu-US-CA] Ubuntu Tri-Fold Source Files

2010-03-28 Thread Aaditya Bhatia
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Mark Garrow wrote: > > "Nearly no" implies there > are viruses (viri?) but then we state that we don't need a scanner.. There > should be a better way to state that. > We don't execute every file on sight, so we're virus-proof by design, at least in this sense. Mi

Re: [Ubuntu-US-CA] Ubuntu Tri-Fold Source Files

2010-03-28 Thread Mark Garrow
I can't tell because I haven't really looked close enough, but on the front of the brochure is "Ubuntu" in the new Ubuntu font? Should it be for consistency? Also, under "Join the Community / Get Help: should we mention the IRC channels and the relevant server? Granted many won't know wh

Re: [Ubuntu-US-CA] Ubuntu Tri-Fold Source Files

2010-03-28 Thread Aaditya Bhatia
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Jack Deslippe wrote: > > http://civet.berkeley.edu/~jdeslip/Ubuntu/ > Have a look and give me some comments. > -Jack > "Do I need to defrag or use antivirus software? Nope. The Ubuntu filesystem DOES need to be defragmented and ..." Looks like a typo near the en

[Ubuntu-US-CA] Ubuntu Tri-Fold Source Files

2010-03-28 Thread Jack Deslippe
Hi Everyone, I have put up the source files for our second brochure here: http://civet.berkeley.edu/~jdeslip/Ubuntu/ Have a look and give me some comments. -Jack -- Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list Ubuntu-us-ca@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/list