[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 881046]

2013-01-30 Thread Bjoernv
One possible answer to my own question is, that AMD's ATI Catalyst driver disables the Xorg RandR extension and enables it's own RandR extention: from /var/log/Xorg.0.log: [...] [68.714] (II) fglrx(0): RandR 1.2 support is enabled! [68.714] (II) fglrx(0): RandR 1.2 rotation support is enab

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 883319]

2013-01-30 Thread Bjoernv
One possible answer to my own question is, that AMD's ATI Catalyst driver disables the Xorg RandR extension and enables it's own RandR extention: from /var/log/Xorg.0.log: [...] [68.714] (II) fglrx(0): RandR 1.2 support is enabled! [68.714] (II) fglrx(0): RandR 1.2 rotation support is enab

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 881046]

2013-01-24 Thread Bjoernv
I wonder, why the maximum panning size is so driver dependent. My ATI Radeon HD 3450 had a maximum panning size of 8192x8192 with the open source "radeon" and "radeonhd" drivers. With AMD's ATI Catalyst 13.1 Legacy driver I only have a maximum of 1920x1920. The monitor's native size is Full-HD (19

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 883319]

2013-01-24 Thread Bjoernv
I wonder, why the maximum panning size is so driver dependent. My ATI Radeon HD 3450 had a maximum panning size of 8192x8192 with the open source "radeon" and "radeonhd" drivers. With AMD's ATI Catalyst 13.1 Legacy driver I only have a maximum of 1920x1920. The monitor's native size is Full-HD (19