[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-23 Thread Conn O Griofa
Petar, You clearly implied that I was misinterpreting my results in the first sentence of comment #37. In comment #59, I acknowledged that your system appears not to have the same memory leak issue; as I said, your allocation increases /and/ decreases, unlike my own. I asked for evidence simply

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Conn O Griofa
Martin, Although the initial feedback from most people seems to indicate that the proposed update fixes the issue, I haven't seen anybody post output that would positively confirm the leak as being fixed (in other words, that the GEM object byte allocation is actually reducing when applications

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-22 Thread Conn O Griofa
Petar Volkovski, What you did in comment #51 is just another variation of the testcase in the bug description that others have been performing (and that you insist does not represent a memory leak). Your output differs from mine in that the GEM allocation increases *and* decreases. I have never

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Unfortunately, this proposed X server update has not resolved the problem on my system. I'm using a stock Ubuntu Lucid installation, compiz enabled, and with the proposed X server update. c...@nx9010:~$ lspci | grep VGA 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon IGP

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Update on comment #33: I managed to have a quick word with David Airlie, and he told me that the radeon driver does not report the pinned/pin/gtt values, so that's not an issue. Here are some results from kernel 2.6.34-rc5 with the latest xorg-edgers packages [1]: c...@nx9010:~$ glxinfo | grep

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Using kernel 2.6.32-21-generic and xorg-edgers packages: After just 10 minutes uptime the slowdown has occurred, with a lower object bytes count than before. Here is the output at the point in which the slowdown became noticeable: c...@nx9010:~$ pid=`pidof X` ; for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Final test: kernel 2.6.34-rc5 + stock drivers + proposed X server update. X server uptime: approximately 1 hour. c...@nx9010:~$ glxinfo | grep GLX version GLX version: 1.2 c...@nx9010:~$ pid=`pidof X` ; for t in `seq 1 10`; do eog /usr/share/backgrounds ; echo `grep object bytes

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 565981] Re: [KMS] gem objects not deallocated

2010-04-21 Thread Conn O Griofa
Peter Velkovski, Thanks for the suggestion, but on my system - even if I close all applications on the running X server - the GEM object bytes value *never* decreases. Freeing the pagecache, dentries and inodes (as you suggest) makes no difference at any point. The only way to reduce the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 380126] Re: [Karmic] Touchpad not recognised correctly, synaptics driver not in use

2010-03-17 Thread Conn O Griofa
Jeremy, Unfortunately I can no longer do any testing due to the fact that the laptop in question became physically damaged. However, the bug may be invalid; I remember that there was a change to the default mouse configuration which disabled touch-to-click at the time I filed this bug (a fact I