[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1787845] [NEW] Broken xdriinfo on Ubuntu 18.04 breaks driconf

2018-08-19 Thread Felix Kuehling
Public bug reported: driconf doesn't work on Ubuntu 18.04. The reason is that xdriinfo fails with "Screen 0: not direct rendering capable." There appears to be a fix for this upstream: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/xdriinfo/commit/?id=6273d9dacbf165331c21bcda5a8945c8931d87b8 Building my

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949286] Re: System Crash / Restart

2012-05-23 Thread Felix Kuehling
Your Xorg log looks like you're using the open-source Radeon driver, not Fglrx. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949286 Title: System Crash / Restart To manage

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 939858] Re: Switch user does not work

2012-02-24 Thread Felix Kuehling
I think the problem is that you're simply running out of video memory. Each user session runs in its own Xserver. Each Xserver needs video memory for various render and display buffers. A number of factors influence video memory usage: * number and size of attached monitors * virtual desktop size

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 816705] Re: fglrxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryExtension()

2011-08-19 Thread Felix Kuehling
This problem usually occurs when the Mesa libGL is used with our 3D driver or our libGL with the Mesa 3D driver. Please ensure that fglrx is correctly installed and active. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 818263] Re: package fglrx 2:8.821-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2011-07-29 Thread Felix Kuehling
RV350 is not supported by fglrx after 8.59x. Ubuntu 11.04 needs at least fglrx 8.84x. Please use the open-source drivers included in Ubuntu 11.04 for your hardware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 800649] Re: Top Taskbar misdisplayed

2011-06-23 Thread Felix Kuehling
Looks more like a Unity problem to me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800649 Title: Top Taskbar misdisplayed To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 793576] Re: after update-error loading OS-could not find module ath_pci

2011-06-08 Thread Felix Kuehling
There is zero information in this bug report. I don't know what ath_pci is. I don't think it is related to fglrx. You'd find more help in a support forum. I doubt this report is appropriate for a bug tracker. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 758609] Re: natty beta Ubuntu Classic (No effects) SDL|openGL window always on top

2011-06-08 Thread Felix Kuehling
This sounds familiar. Unchecking /apps/metacity/general/capture_before_unmap in gconf-editor should solve the issue. Last time I discussed this with Bryce Harrington he assured me that this was a bug in metacity, not in fglrx. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 758609] Re: natty beta Ubuntu Classic (No effects) SDL|openGL window always on top

2011-06-08 Thread Felix Kuehling
Log out and log back in after unchecking capture_before_unmap. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758609 Title: natty beta Ubuntu Classic (No effects) SDL|openGL window

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 793662] Re: package fglrx 2:8.780-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2011-06-08 Thread Felix Kuehling
Fglrx version 8.780 doesn't support kernel version 2.6.38. You need at least an 8.84-based version of fglrx. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793662 Title: package

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 545257] Re: gnome-screensaver-gl-helper crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryVersion()

2011-05-27 Thread Felix Kuehling
Why is this being resurrected. This was not a bug to begin with, but more a support request. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545257 Title: gnome-screensaver-gl-helper

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 776543] Re: Xorg seg fault

2011-05-13 Thread Felix Kuehling
Please try this after installing fglrx: * Uninstall fglrx if it's still installed * rm -rf /etc/ati * Install fglrx again * Reboot Does X start successfully after this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 781406] Re: package fglrx 2:8.840-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2011-05-11 Thread Felix Kuehling
DKMS failed to build the fglrx kernel module for kernel 2.6.39. Kernel 2.6.39 is not supported by fglrx yet. If you're going to use the fglrx driver, you'll need to stick with the stock 2.6.38 kernel until fglrx is updated to support 2.6.39. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 778831] Re: Ubuntu doesn't boot to unity or effects without fglrx driver installed

2011-05-09 Thread Felix Kuehling
Whoever queued this bug to fglrx, please read the description again. This is not a bug in fglrx, it actually says that fglrx is the only driver that works for this user. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 780144] Re: Unable to enable fglrx driver since updated to 2.6.38-8

2011-05-09 Thread Felix Kuehling
You need Catalyst 11.4 or newer (fglrx 8.84 or newer) to support kernel version 2.6.38. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780144 Title: Unable to enable fglrx driver

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 763005] Re: Fglrx with Compiz's Sync to Vblank makes Unity/Compiz plugins to crawl

2011-05-03 Thread Felix Kuehling
@robinl: I've seen that problem. The updates very infrequently when there is a high FPS application running, for example glxgears or fgl_glxgears. I believe this is a bug in compiz. Setting Wait for vertical refresh under 3D-More Settings to Always on works around the problem for me because it

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 747729] Re: fglrx crashes X server on startup

2011-05-02 Thread Felix Kuehling
@Beat: What's the output for dkms status? Is the kernel module compiled and installed correctly for the -pae kernel? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747729 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 747729] Re: fglrx crashes X server on startup

2011-05-02 Thread Felix Kuehling
That looks like there is no fglrx kernel module installed for the -pae kernel. Normally DKMS should build the kernel module automatically when you boot your -pae kernel. If that's not happening for some reason, that may be a bug in DKMS. You can manually tell DKMS to build the fglrx kernel module

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 763005] Re: Fglrx with Compiz's Sync to Vblank makes Unity/Compiz plugins to crawl

2011-05-02 Thread Felix Kuehling
The Catalyst Control Center has two vblank settings. One is the global tear-free setting under Display Option. The other one is Wait for vertical refresh under 3D-More Settings. Does it help if you set the latter to Off, unless applications specifies and restart X? -- You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 747729] Re: fglrx crashes X server on startup

2011-05-02 Thread Felix Kuehling
Thanks, Beat, for following up. Your problem seems to be solved, but it's different from the problem originally reported by Vladimir. @Vladimir: I saw the same problem when I updated my developer system from Ubuntu 10.10 to 11.04 earlier today. After running sudo aticonfig --initial -f X could

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 763005] Re: Fglrx with Compiz's Sync to Vblank makes Unity/Compiz plugins to crawl

2011-05-02 Thread Felix Kuehling
@robinl: What about the sync-to-vsync setting in CompizConfig Settings Manager (AKA ccsm)? As already reported by other users, this seems to be the main problem leading to poor compositor frame rates on Ubuntu 11.04 with fglrx, regardless of raw hardware performance. Some users with low end or

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 769911] Re: System freeze after login in 11.04

2011-04-26 Thread Felix Kuehling
Why was this queued to fglrx-installer? This is on NVidia hardware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769911 Title: System freeze after login in 11.04

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 770669] Re: package fglrx 2:8.840-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2011-04-26 Thread Felix Kuehling
The 8.840 driver doesn't support kernel 2.6.39. Please use the 2.6.38 kernel included in Ubuntu 11.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770669 Title: package fglrx

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 749921] Re: package fglrx 2:8.840-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2011-04-04 Thread Felix Kuehling
Your DKMS build log indicates that it fails to build an fglrx 8.831 kernel module (Catalyst 11.3 by the looks of it). That version of fglrx is incompatible with your 2.6.38 kernel. Please uninstall fglrx 8.831 before installing fglrx 8.84x. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 747576] Re: kwin_opengl_test crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryVersion()

2011-04-04 Thread Felix Kuehling
Please attach your /var/log/Xorg.0.log and /etc/X11/xorg.conf. I suspect that after the update you're not using the fglrx driver in the Xserver for some reason. But the fglrx libGL is active at the same time. The fglrx libGL is incompatible with the open-source X drivers. -- You received this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 747729] Re: fglrx crashes X server on startup

2011-04-04 Thread Felix Kuehling
Your Xorg log shows that you're using some unusual fglrx options in your xorg.conf. Looks xorg.conf was originally created by a really old version of fglrx. Could you try the following steps to reinitialize the fglrx configuration: 1) Reboot the system, in the boot loader select Recovery mode 2)

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 748883] Re: package fglrx 2:8.840-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2011-04-04 Thread Felix Kuehling
Your DKMS build log shows that it fails to build the 8.821 kernel module (Catalyst 11.2). Make sure you uninstall any previous versions of fglrx before installing fglrx 8.84x. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 747576] Re: kwin_opengl_test crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryVersion()

2011-04-04 Thread Felix Kuehling
As I suspected, you're running the radeon 2D driver with the fglrx 3D driver, which don't work together. fglrx is commented out in xorg.conf and replaced with ati. Revert that change, reboot and all should be well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 734784] Re: desktop crashes out if extra visual effects are applied

2011-03-14 Thread Felix Kuehling
If you're running Ubuntu in a virtual machine, this can't be a bug in fglrx. In the virtual machine you can't access the Radeon graphics device directly. So you can't use the fglrx driver. Having fglrx installed without using it can cause problems. So if you have fglrx installed, uninstall it.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 709505] Re: [MASTER] fglrx failed to install/upgrade due to being incompatible with 2.6.38 kernel

2011-03-10 Thread Felix Kuehling
Catalyst 11.2 may have worked with earlier 2.6.38 RCs, but broke with later RCs and the final versions due to the renaming of acquire/release_console_sem to console_lock/unlock. That said, the kernel compatibility is fixed by a small patch. The Xserver is the bigger problem. -- You received this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 730278] Re: Xorg fails to start with fglrx in mult-monitor mode with right-rotated monitor

2011-03-08 Thread Felix Kuehling
This problem should be fixed in the 8.80 driver release (Catalyst 10.12 and later). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730278 Title: Xorg fails to start with fglrx in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 710255] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: попытка перезаписи '/usr/share/fglrx/atigetsysteminfo.sh', котор(ый)ая также находится в пакете xorg-driver

2011-01-31 Thread Felix Kuehling
Radeon XPress 1250 is not supported by the current fglrx driver. I recommend you uninstall fglrx and use the open-source radeon driver instead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 697983] Re: Click Deslkop and systemsettings crashes every time

2011-01-07 Thread Felix Kuehling
Looks more like a support request than a bug report. There are no log files or configuration files and no information about the hardware configuration. I don't see any indication in the report that you're using fglrx. But the symptom looks somewhat familiar. It usually happens when you're using a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 684171] Re: [Amarok] docking all three content windows into Amarok main window crashes xserver

2010-12-02 Thread Felix Kuehling
Please attach /var/log/Xorg.0.log and /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old just after the Xserver crashed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684171 Title: [Amarok] docking all three

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 662347] Re: multiple monitor config issue. Worked 10.04. Prob 10.10

2010-11-04 Thread Felix Kuehling
fglrx doesn't support growing the primary surface at runtime beyond the initial size. You can work around the problem by making the Virtual screen size bigger in your xorg.conf to allocate a larger primary surface during Xserver startup. -- multiple monitor config issue. Worked 10.04. Prob

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 671088] Re: xorg.conf error in fglrx-installer

2010-11-04 Thread Felix Kuehling
The same libglx.so is loaded in both cases. It's very unlikely that the change in performance is due to libglx being specified in xorg.conf or not. Just in case, I tried it but I can't reproduce this effect here. Are there any other differences between your test configurations? One thing that has

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 669179] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-11-01 Thread Felix Kuehling
From the DKMS log: DKMS make.log for fglrx-8.723.1 for kernel 2.6.32-25-generic (x86_64) Sun Oct 31 17:56:22 GMT 2010 AMD kernel module generator version 2.1 doing Makefile based build for kernel 2.6.x and higher Makefile:99: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop. Makefile:99: *** mixed

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 669577] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-11-01 Thread Felix Kuehling
Ubuntu 10.04 shipped with a 2.6.32 kernel. You upgraded the kernel to 2.6.34. The 8.723 driver doesn't support kernel 2.6.34. Try a current Catalyst release. -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669577

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 666807] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-10-26 Thread Felix Kuehling
Your Xorg.0.log shows you're using the Intel driver. So I guess your laptop has Switchable graphics and the Intel graphics device is the one that's enabled by default. The only way for you to use the RadeonHD 4330 under Linux at this time is to disable the Intel graphics in the BIOS setup. If your

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 666951] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 [modified: lib/fglrx/modprobe.conf] failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-10-26 Thread Felix Kuehling
There are no log files attached that provide any details of the kernel module build failure. However, Rage 128 is not supported by fglrx. Please use the open-source ATI driver included in Ubuntu. -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 [modified: lib/fglrx/modprobe.conf] failed to install/upgrade:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 665807] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-10-25 Thread Felix Kuehling
You're using kernel 2.6.35, which is not supported by the 8.723 driver version. Furthermore you don't have the matching kernel headers installed. Catalyst 10.10 should work if you install the matching kernel headers to your 2.6.35 kernel. -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 663867] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-10-20 Thread Felix Kuehling
Catalyst 10.4 is half a year old. It doesn't support Maverick. The 8.780 driver included in Maverick does work though. -- package fglrx 2:8.723-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663867 You received this bug notification

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 663567] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-10-19 Thread Felix Kuehling
In DKMSBuildLog.txt: /bin/sh: gcc: not found How is that even possible? dkms depends on gcc. Something is severely broken with your system. -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663567 You received

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 660938] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-10-15 Thread Felix Kuehling
The 8.723 fglrx driver you're using doesn't support kernel 2.6.35. -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 660679] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-10-14 Thread Felix Kuehling
Can't tell what went wrong from the attached log files. Try running this in a terminal window: find /var/lib/dkms/fglrx -name *.log | while read name; do echo === Dump of $name ===; cat $name; done dkms.log and attach the resulting dkms.log to this bug report. -- package fglrx

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 658170] Re: ati catalyst proprietary display driver not working after upgrade from 10.4 to 10.10 (amd64 ATI Radeon HD 4650)

2010-10-12 Thread Felix Kuehling
The hotfix driver doesn't support Ubuntu 10.10 yet. The 8.780 driver included in Ubuntu 10.10 does and it has the same workaround as the hotfix driver. Use the fglrx that comes with Ubuntu 10.10. This is the only driver that supports Ubuntu 10.10 until Catalyst 10.10 is release on amd.com. --

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 658170] Re: ati catalyst proprietary display driver not working after upgrade from 10.4 to 10.10 (amd64 ATI Radeon HD 4650)

2010-10-12 Thread Felix Kuehling
If you didn't install the driver using jockey (the HW manager) you need to run aticonfig --initial and reboot to activate the driver. -- ati catalyst proprietary display driver not working after upgrade from 10.4 to 10.10 (amd64 ATI Radeon HD 4650) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658170 You

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 656439] Re: package fglrx 2:8.780-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-10-07 Thread Felix Kuehling
Looks like you need to install linux-headers-2.6.35-22-generic. fglrx depends on linux-headers|linux-headers-generic, which can be satisfied by different versions of kernel headers. You need to make sure that you have the ones matching the kernel you're actually running. -- package fglrx

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 642518] Re: [MASTER] package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: Kernel fix for CVE-2010-3081 breaks fglrx

2010-09-28 Thread Felix Kuehling
For users of Catalyst 10.9, there is now a hotfix release at http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/GPU83ATICatalystLinuxHotfix.aspx. -- [MASTER] package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: Kernel fix for CVE-2010-3081 breaks fglrx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642518 You

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 646301] Re: package fglrx 2:8.780-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-09-23 Thread Felix Kuehling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 609938 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609938 DKMSBuildLog.txt shows that it's trying to build 8.723. But DkmsStatus.txt shows that 8.780 source code is installed. Is DKMS confused? Or does the real problem occur before DKMS tries to build the kernel

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 642518] Re: [MASTER] package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: Kernel fix for CVE-2010-3081 breaks fglrx

2010-09-21 Thread Felix Kuehling
@Nicolas Delvaux: Correct. Catalyst drivers on amd.com are not fixed yet. We're working on getting the fix into the next Catalyst release in October. -- [MASTER] package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: Kernel fix for CVE-2010-3081 breaks fglrx

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 593272] Re: python2.6 crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryExtension()

2010-09-17 Thread Felix Kuehling
Sorry, I had a typo in my request. I need the output of ls -l /usr/lib/libGL* Either way, if you uninstalled fglrx, the problem is gone and no one else has this problem, I guess this bug report can be closed. -- python2.6 crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryExtension()

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 593272] Re: python2.6 crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryExtension()

2010-09-15 Thread Felix Kuehling
This usually happens when the wrong libGL is in use. Either fglrx is installed but a stale libGL is in /usr/lib, or fglrx is installed but not actually in use (not configured in xorg.conf). To know what's going on I'd like to see Xorg.0.log and xorg.conf from an affected system as well as the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 609938] Re: fglrx fails build on 2.6.35-10-generic

2010-09-15 Thread Felix Kuehling
This happens every time Ubuntu updates their kernel and/or Xorg version and leaves the old fglrx driver in place that was never designed to work with those new X.org and kernel versions. Maybe one way to save users this kind of trouble in the future would be to add versioned dependencies to fglrx

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 617881] Re: package fglrx-kernel-source 2:8.593-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-09-01 Thread Felix Kuehling
You're trying to install our Legacy driver on a current OS. That's not going to work. The last Ubuntu version supported by the legacy driver was Ubuntu 8.10. Your RS690 (Radeon X1200) is not supported by the current proprietary driver. So your only option on current Ubuntu versions is the open

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 623544] Re: package fglrx-kernel-source 2:8.593-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-08-24 Thread Felix Kuehling
The 8.593 driver you're using is the last one that works on R5xx-based cards, such as your X1600. However, that driver doesn't support any Ubuntu version newer than Ubuntu 8.10. On Ubuntu 10.04 your only choice for a graphics driver is the open- source Radeon driver that ships with Ubuntu. That

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 545257] Re: gnome-screensaver-gl-helper crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryVersion()

2010-06-23 Thread Felix Kuehling
You installed fglrx but you didn't configure Xorg to actually use it. You're still using the RADEON driver. Having fglrx installed breaks the open-source 3D driver in the way you're experiencing. To activate fglrx run the following command and reboot: sudo aticonfig --initial -f --

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 560570] Re: fglrx fails to identify attached monitor, displays blank screen

2010-06-22 Thread Felix Kuehling
I noticed you're using an nVidia MCP51 chipset. I've seen other reports of our driver hanging systems with that chipset. -- fglrx fails to identify attached monitor, displays blank screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 592783] Re: page fault on read access in libgl.so.1

2010-06-21 Thread Felix Kuehling
The problem sounds like it's using the wrong version of libGL.so.1. Check the output of ldd /usr/bin/fgl_glxgears for example. If it uses libGL.so.1 from /usr/lib, that's wrong. If you're using the Ubuntu packages of fglrx, it should be using /usr/lib/fglrx/libGL.so.1 and there should be no

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 596620] Re: fglrx from x-updates ppa crashes

2010-06-21 Thread Felix Kuehling
Adding a BusID line to the fglrx Device section in xorg.conf should fix this. Just regenerating your xorg.conf with aticonfig --initial -f should take care of this. -- fglrx from x-updates ppa crashes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596620 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 592783] Re: page fault on read access in libgl.so.1

2010-06-21 Thread Felix Kuehling
Hmm, I looked at your Xorg.0.log and lspci output. You're using a Mach64-based card. This card is not supported by the fglrx driver. In your case having fglrx installed actually breaks the Mach64 driver. I recommend you uninstall fglrx. That will give you as much functionality and performance as

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 560570] Re: fglrx fails to identify attached monitor, displays blank screen

2010-06-18 Thread Felix Kuehling
Have you tried it with the latest Catalyst driver (Catalyst 10.6, driver release 8.743)? To update using generated Ubuntu packages, download Catalyst into an empty directory and run ati-driver-installer...run --buildpkg dpkg --install *.deb aticonfig --initial -f and reboot. --

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 580392] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

2010-05-14 Thread Felix Kuehling
Kernel version 2.6.33 is not supported by this driver. There are unofficial patches floating around to make fglrx compile on kernel 2.6.33 and 2.6.34, if you're feeling adventurous. -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: fglrx kernel module failed to build

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 578736] Re: fglrx broken (no 3D, jerky movements scrolling).won't uninstall

2010-05-11 Thread Felix Kuehling
Looks like a version mismatch between the kernel module and the user- space X driver. The kernel module seems to come from Catalyst 10.4, the user-space driver comes from the fglrx-package included in Ubuntu. I'd recommend uninstalling all versions of fglrx that you have installed, make sure that

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 577906] Re: No login screen at startup

2010-05-11 Thread Felix Kuehling
At this point I see no evidence of a driver bug. Is the problem reproducible after uninstalling fglrx? If yes, it's definitely not a bug in fglrx. -- No login screen at startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 494699] Re: Does not support current Lucid kernel (2.6.32) or xserver (1.7)

2010-05-11 Thread Felix Kuehling
@SunnyDrake: When you install the Catalyst driver from amd.com, make sure you uninstall the fglrx packages included in Ubuntu first. -- Does not support current Lucid kernel (2.6.32) or xserver (1.7) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494699 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 577906] Re: No login screen at startup

2010-05-10 Thread Felix Kuehling
Your xorg.conf looks like it wasn't generated by aticonfig. Try if running this as root fixes the problem: aticonfig --initial -f -- No login screen at startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 577906] Re: No login screen at startup

2010-05-10 Thread Felix Kuehling
Your Xorg.log.auto looks OK. Xorg.log.manu looks incomplete, like the output of the Xserver on the console it was started from. Either way, there is no more crash or segault. The black screen when you start X without any clients connecting to the Xserver is normal. As far as I can tell, the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 577906] Re: No login screen at startup

2010-05-10 Thread Felix Kuehling
I don't see anything wrong with the log files. X starts, apparently in the monitor's native resolution (1920x1080). Then there is a VT switch and finally it looks like a clean shutdown. No evidence of a crash. What exactly are the symptoms of the problem you're observing now? The only unexpected

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 494699] Re: Does not support current Lucid kernel (2.6.32) or xserver (1.7)

2010-05-07 Thread Felix Kuehling
@icosena: make sure you don't have an old version of libGL laying around in /usr/lib. In Ubuntu Lucid there should be no /usr/lib/libGL.so*. If you have any version of libGL left there, try removing it (keep a backup just in case) and see if the problem goes away. -- Does not support current

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 574644] Re: X will not start and crashes after upgrade from Karmic

2010-05-03 Thread Felix Kuehling
Current versions of fglrx don't support Radeon X700 hardware. Only Radeond HD 2xxx and newer is supported. BTW, the same applied to Ubuntu 9.10 and 9.04. You should continue using the Radeon driver. Do not install fglrx on your system. -- X will not start and crashes after upgrade from Karmic

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 355533] Re: fglrx on Aspire 5672 (Radeon X1400) server freeze at startup

2010-04-28 Thread Felix Kuehling
Radeon X1400 is not supported by current fglrx releases. Fglrx currently supports Radeon HD 2xxx and later. -- fglrx on Aspire 5672 (Radeon X1400) server freeze at startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355533 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 568963] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2

2010-04-23 Thread Felix Kuehling
You're using Xserver 1.8. Version 1.8 is not supported by the driver yet. -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568963 You received this bug notification because you

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 568963] Re: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2

2010-04-23 Thread Felix Kuehling
Check your apt sources. Maybe you're using some non-standard apt repository that already has Xserver 1.8. -- package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568963 You received this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 567967] Re: Mounting a system from LG's HL-DT-ST DVD-ROM GDR-H30N makes Xorg to freeze

2010-04-22 Thread Felix Kuehling
Bryce, Alberto clearly stated that he gets the same symptoms when using NVidia graphics. This is clearly not a bug in fglrx. -- Mounting a system from LG's HL-DT-ST DVD-ROM GDR-H30N makes Xorg to freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567967 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 552644] Re: Lucid Lynx 64 bit nightly build hangs on boot

2010-04-22 Thread Felix Kuehling
@Alberto, Matthew: I don't think it's a problem with the kernel module. Matthew's lsmod command actually shows that the kernel module is loaded. The error messages are from the Xorg log. It's the user-space fglrx_drv.so that can't be found. Maybe Xorg isn't looking in the right place for some

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 568591] Re: Non-proprietary (Ubuntu's default) video driver eventually switches monitor to a fuzzy mode (ATI/AMD video hardware)

2010-04-22 Thread Felix Kuehling
If this is a problem with the open-source drivers, it shouldn't be reported against fglrx-installer. -- Non-proprietary (Ubuntu's default) video driver eventually switches monitor to a fuzzy mode (ATI/AMD video hardware) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568591 You received this bug notification

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 449867] Re: xrandr reports incorrect maximum screen size

2010-04-21 Thread Felix Kuehling
@mback: Your xorg.conf specifies the virtual size as 2048x2048. If you set it to 3200x1200, it should work fine. I guess this bug can be closed as Invalid. -- xrandr reports incorrect maximum screen size https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449867 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 551475] Re: amdcccle settings do not persist lucid

2010-04-19 Thread Felix Kuehling
The Catalyst Control Center stores its configuration settings in xorg.conf. If you've used the GNOME monitor applet in the past, it applies its settings when you log in and overrides any settings stored in xorg.conf. Try deleting ~/.config/monitors.xml, log out and log back in. Does that make

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-16 Thread Felix Kuehling
It could be a bug in Compiz too since the corruption only occurs when compiz is used. If someone reproduces it with fglrx and fails to reproduce it with radeon with the same set of monitors it would show that the problem is likely in fglrx. That would require hardware with 3D support in both fglrx

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 563464] Re: Window manager does not load

2010-04-15 Thread Felix Kuehling
Your Xorg.log file indicates that you're still using the Radeon driver and DRI is disabled. That's why compiz is not starting. Sounds like you're using your own session startup script. Try replacing compiz with metacity, that way you'll at least be able to move your windows around and get through

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-15 Thread Felix Kuehling
Felix, all your statements are correct. xrandr --output CRT2 --left-of DFP4 used after login to get screen on left side. I can not find place in amdcccle to do this move. You should be able to move the monitors around in CCC-LE by drag-and- drop to change their relative positions. --

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-15 Thread Felix Kuehling
The second LCD is an analog TV connected to lower DVI connector with an adapter. Can you confirm what kind of display and connector this is? Is it a TV with SVideo, Composite (1 RCA) or Component video (3 RCA) input? Or is it an LCD monitor with VGA (15-pin D-Sub connector) input? -- Unusable

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-14 Thread Felix Kuehling
Ok, let me restate the problem: Monitors positioned incorrectly and visual corruption in 2 monitor setup with monitors positioned side by side Your xorg.conf clearly shows that CRT2 should be right of DFP4. But your screenshot shows the opposite positioning. I'm assuming the original screenshot

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 552644] Re: Lucid Lynx 64 bit nightly build hangs on boot

2010-04-14 Thread Felix Kuehling
@Proxess: This shouldn't be necessary. The fglrx installation disables KMS by blacklisting the radeon kernel module. -- Lucid Lynx 64 bit nightly build hangs on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552644 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 561665] Re: fglrx/glx/xorg crashes on boot 10.4 ati x700

2010-04-13 Thread Felix Kuehling
X700 is not supported by the current fglrx driver. Your Xorg log file shows that you're actually still using the open-source Radeon driver. Fglrx replaces libGL.so and libglx.so with incompatible versions, which is causing your problems. If you uninstall fglrx the Radeon driver should work without

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 561982] Re: Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup

2010-04-13 Thread Felix Kuehling
Looks like normal behaviour to me. The CRT uses a lower resolution, so you end up with dead space. You can change the resolution on the CRT to match the vertical size of the DFP. -- Unusable Area on main screen in 2 screen setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561982 You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 561665] Re: fglrx/glx/xorg crashes on boot 10.4 ati x700

2010-04-13 Thread Felix Kuehling
Did you reboot after uninstalling fglrx? I highly recommend you do that. Either way, this is not a bug in fglrx. I recommend closing this bug. If your problem persists, report a new bug against the radeon driver and make sure you include log files generated without fglrx installed. --

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 560364] Re: Random system freeze

2010-04-13 Thread Felix Kuehling
This bug was fixed in fglrx-8.723. Please update. -- Random system freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu. ___ Mailing

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 555158] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryExtension()

2010-04-12 Thread Felix Kuehling
Hi Thiago, your hardware is not supported by the fglrx driver. Only R6xx and later hardware is supported by the current driver version. The problem is that you're using the radeon driver while fglrx is installed. The fglrx libGL and libglx is incompatible with the radeon driver. Uninstall fglrx

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 546885] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryVersion()

2010-04-12 Thread Felix Kuehling
@Nils: You're still using the radeon driver, not fglrx. Run aticonfig --initial -f and reboot to activate fglrx. @Dann: You get this watermark if /etc/ati/signature is not installed correctly. The fact that /etc/ati/control was missing as well indicates that something went wrong during driver

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 560570] Re: fglrx fails to identify attached monitor, displays blank screen

2010-04-12 Thread Felix Kuehling
It would be helpful to see an Xorg.0.log file with fglrx active. Both XorgLog.txt and XorgLogOld.txt attached to this bug are with RADEON active. -- fglrx fails to identify attached monitor, displays blank screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560570 You received this bug notification because

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 561354] Re: unable to drag a windows from one monitor to another

2010-04-12 Thread Felix Kuehling
What you're describing is a feature, not a bug. You configured two independent desktops. Use Multi-display desktop with display(s) X to set up an extended desktop that spans both monitors and allows you to drag windows from one to the other. -- unable to drag a windows from one monitor to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 560777] Re: fglrx driver fails to load

2010-04-12 Thread Felix Kuehling
Looks like you're using an old driver version on a new Xserver. You need the new fgrlx 8.721 or 8.723 packages for fglrx to work on Lucid. -- fglrx driver fails to load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 560777] Re: fglrx driver fails to load

2010-04-12 Thread Felix Kuehling
The latest Catalyst drivers don't support Lucid yet. But Lucid already includes a driver version that does work on Lucid. The package name is fglrx. The control center comes in a separate package fglrx-amdcccle. You can install them using Synaptics or aptitude or whatever your favourite package

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 560570] Re: fglrx fails to identify attached monitor, displays blank screen

2010-04-12 Thread Felix Kuehling
The log file just stops half way through the driver initialization. There's no backtrace. There are two possibilities: 1. the Xserver is still spinning at 100% CPU load in the background 2. the system crashed hard and didn't have a chance to write the complete log file to the disk You could try

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 552644] Re: Lucid Lynx 64 bit nightly build hangs on boot

2010-04-08 Thread Felix Kuehling
Xorg.0.log from comment #12 shows that fglrx is not installed correctly: (II) LoadModule: fglrx (WW) Warning, couldn't open module fglrx (II) UnloadModule: fglrx (EE) Failed to load module fglrx (module does not exist, 0) (EE) No drivers available. Fatal server error: no screens found -- Lucid

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 556267] Re: Xorg assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/X: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x08f96410 ***

2010-04-08 Thread Felix Kuehling
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 501551 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501551 According to the attached Xorg.0.log file the user was using the Radeon driver, not fglrx. But the bug is marked as affecting fglrx-installer. Whoever has the authority to fix this bug record, please do so.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 552644] Re: Lucid Lynx 64 bit nightly build hangs on boot

2010-04-08 Thread Felix Kuehling
The log file says that the fglrx driver module wasn't found. It should have been installed in /usr/lib/xorg/extra- modules/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so. If that file doesn't exist, something went wrong during installation. -- Lucid Lynx 64 bit nightly build hangs on boot

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 432531] Re: Unknown/unaccounted memory leak

2010-03-18 Thread Felix Kuehling
Anyone experiencing this problem on Karmic, check if you're affected by https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/501715 The memory leak occurs after system updates that trigger ureadahead to reprofile. Rebooting fixes the problem. A workaround is to reboot the system twice after

  1   2   >