Broken panning, Bug 77321 , got a downstream fix 5 months ago in
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771521
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881046
Title:
Panning
Broken panning, Bug 77321 , got a downstream fix 5 months ago in
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771521
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883319
Title:
xrandr -
(In reply to Michal Suchanek from comment #26)
> This seems to work for me.
Are you sure nothing is setting DPI explicitly or implicitly, such as your DE?
> X.Org version: 1.17.2
> resolution:100x100 dots per inch
> Actual resolution seems to be more like 109 dpi but it's certainly not fixe
(In reply to comment #53)
> Probably this bug has been marked invalid because there is a mix of two bugs
> here: one is related to panning (which I do not know if it's fixed or no),
> and the other one to mouse constraints when scaling
This bug has not been marked invalid.
> I have X.Org X Serve
(In reply to comment #53)
> Probably this bug has been marked invalid because there is a mix of two bugs
> here: one is related to panning (which I do not know if it's fixed or no),
> and the other one to mouse constraints when scaling
This bug has not been marked invalid.
> I have X.Org X Serve
Since panning at least can work via xrandr, I've forked the failure of
xorg.con* to provide equivalent panning function of xrandr without
arbitrary mouse constraint to bug 77321
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubunt
Since panning at least can work via xrandr, I've forked the failure of
xorg.con* to provide equivalent panning function of xrandr without
arbitrary mouse constraint to bug 77321
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubunt
Panning works via xrandr (only; not via xorg.con*) also in Kubuntu
12.04's server 1.11.4, while scaling does fail by having the mouse
cursor bound within the screen mode's size.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubunt
Panning works via xrandr (only; not via xorg.con*) also in Kubuntu
12.04's server 1.11.4, while scaling does fail by having the mouse
cursor bound within the screen mode's size.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubunt
As the summary is currently written, this bug is INVALID. Panning works
at least as far back as 1.13.2-1.21.1.i586 in openSUSE 12.3
(i865G,rv200), in addition to current 1.15.x and 1.16rc1 servers in
Fedora, Mageia, and openSUSE, but only when xrandr is used to configure
it. Configuration via /etc/
As the summary is currently written, this bug is INVALID. Panning works
at least as far back as 1.13.2-1.21.1.i586 in openSUSE 12.3
(i865G,rv200), in addition to current 1.15.x and 1.16rc1 servers in
Fedora, Mageia, and openSUSE, but only when xrandr is used to configure
it. Configuration via /etc/
For well over a week I've been first testing the success of panning for
various combinations of gfxcard, monitor and fb size in servers prior to
the changes resulting in this bug report and then same for installations
to which I've updated using the 94929 patch applied by Tobias Klausmann
in the op
For well over a week I've been first testing the success of panning for
various combinations of gfxcard, monitor and fb size in servers prior to
the changes resulting in this bug report and then same for installations
to which I've updated using the 94929 patch applied by Tobias Klausmann
in the op
With the g84 on 1080 HDTV, apparently scaling, which I never tried before, is
working too:
$ xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --scale 1.2x1.2
(Assorted X data collected via script):
# grep PRETTY /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE 13.2 Milestone 0 (Harlequin) (x86_64)"
# head -n16 /var/log/Xorg.0.log (b
With the g84 on 1080 HDTV, apparently scaling, which I never tried before, is
working too:
$ xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --scale 1.2x1.2
(Assorted X data collected via script):
# grep PRETTY /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE 13.2 Milestone 0 (Harlequin) (x86_64)"
# head -n16 /var/log/Xorg.0.log (b
Via xrandr, 94929 patch also tested working apparently OK for:
ATI rv380 VGA & DVI ports 1680x1050 on 1280x1024
Intel G41 VGA & HDMI ports 1680x1050 on 1280x1024
Nouveau G84 DVI port 1680x1050 on 1280x1024. with & without DVI-to-VGA adapter
Nouveau G84 DVI port 2048x1152 & 2560x1600 & 3840x2160 on
Via xrandr, 94929 patch also tested working apparently OK for:
ATI rv380 VGA & DVI ports 1680x1050 on 1280x1024
Intel G41 VGA & HDMI ports 1680x1050 on 1280x1024
Nouveau G84 DVI port 1680x1050 on 1280x1024. with & without DVI-to-VGA adapter
Nouveau G84 DVI port 2048x1152 & 2560x1600 & 3840x2160 on
Comment 43 applies to use of xorg.conf in attempting to produce desired
X configuration, e.g. xorg.conf for Intel gfx containing:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Default Device"
Option "monitor-VGA1" "Default Monitor"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Default Monitor"
Created attachment 96397
Xorg.0.log from i915 host gx280 having used xrandr to produce panning from
94929 patch
This seems to be unusually verbose for the brief time X was running,
with few apps opened.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscri
Comment 43 applies to use of xorg.conf in attempting to produce desired
X configuration, e.g. xorg.conf for Intel gfx containing:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Default Device"
Option "monitor-VGA1" "Default Monitor"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Default Monitor"
Created attachment 96397
Xorg.0.log from i915 host gx280 having used xrandr to produce panning from
94929 patch
This seems to be unusually verbose for the brief time X was running,
with few apps opened.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscri
Created attachment 96204
Xorg.0.log from 92915G host gx280
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tobijk:/X11:/XOrg/openSUSE_Factory/i586/
ostensibly has the attachment 94929 patch applied, which I installed on
nv11, rv250 and i915G systems running X.Org X Server 1.15.99.901.
# rpm -q --
Created attachment 96204
Xorg.0.log from 92915G host gx280
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/tobijk:/X11:/XOrg/openSUSE_Factory/i586/
ostensibly has the attachment 94929 patch applied, which I installed on
nv11, rv250 and i915G systems running X.Org X Server 1.15.99.901.
# rpm -q --
It seems clear that at least analog hardware users who require panning
and want or need to stick to FOSS solutions need to stick to out of
support Xorg versions and/or out of support drivers, and/or ancient
gfxchip technology (e.g. MGA), and/or cheap (and usually slow) hardware
(e.g. # XGI Techno
It seems clear that at least analog hardware users who require panning
and want or need to stick to FOSS solutions need to stick to out of
support Xorg versions and/or out of support drivers, and/or ancient
gfxchip technology (e.g. MGA), and/or cheap (and usually slow) hardware
(e.g. # XGI Techno
More from that IRC conversation:
I'm not asking about making it default, but when screen size can be
detected and resolution is known, what is the problem with dpi?
It worked at some point in the past
it never worked
Ohsix's definition of "never" must be different from the dictionary's.
As ale
If it hasn't happened already, the supply of supported distros that
feature working panning should be exhausted soon. Is there anything non-
programmers can do to facilitate a programmer fixing this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed t
If it hasn't happened already, the supply of supported distros that
feature working panning should be exhausted soon. Is there anything non-
programmers can do to facilitate a programmer fixing this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed t
(In reply to comment #31)
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/bjoernv:/branches:/openSUSE:/
> 12.2:/Update/standard/
As indicated in downstream https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771521
these work for me with Intel 865G and NVidia G84.
--
You received this bug notificati
(In reply to comment #31)
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/bjoernv:/branches:/openSUSE:/
> 12.2:/Update/standard/
As indicated in downstream https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771521
these work for me with Intel 865G and NVidia G84.
--
You received this bug notificati
(In reply to comment #77)
> (Chrome already does so, in a misguided attempt to force a constant ratio
> between "px" and "pt" across all websites.
Chrome does because it's built on WebKit, where 96 as the only
possibility is the traditional Macintosh way, which became also the
Internet Explorer d
Created attachment 45751
120 DPI full 1600x1200 desktop screenshot
This demonstrates the current state of elevated actual DTE DPI affairs,
as of the release of openSUSE 11.4 about 5 weeks ago. Video chip is
rv380. Driver is radeon. 120 DPI is achieved exclusively via DisplaySize
in xorg.conf. Note
The bug is marked general, not Intel. Various comments spoke of at least
one other chip prior to my MGA comment 58. Before your comment 58
reached my eyes, I had to put that Intel host aside to work on the MGA
host, so I used that to demonstrate what I wrote in comment 58, that
"always" is incorrec
Created attachment 43320
86 DPI screenshot
What do I win? :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521877
Title:
[gm45] wrong screen size detected on X200s
To man
Created attachment 43316
Xorg.0.log from server 1.9.3 using 86x86 DPI on i845G
(In reply to comment #57)
> Isn't this bug precisely about X.org *always ignoring* the hardware DPI value
> from the EDID?
There may have been a time when that was the case, but this was filed by
an Intel video user lo
(In reply to comment #55)
> Please use the correct dpi by default.
If it doesn't, it's usually:
1-your distro's fault, or
2-your hardware's fault, or
3-your use of unequal DPI multiple displays, which is a complicated problem for
X to deal with
X automagic configuration will fall back to 96 if
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771521 explains how panning
works for me using Radeon but not Intel or Nouveau.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881046
Title:
Pa
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771521 explains how panning
works for me using Radeon but not Intel or Nouveau.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883319
Title:
xr
FWIW: I don't try to use randr directly to set up panning. I do it
either through xorg.conf or xorg.conf.d/50-monitor.conf because I'm
usually controlling DPI via DisplaySize, limiting VertRefresh to 60 or
75, turning DPMS & DDC off, and turning DefaultModes on. It would be
nice if TargetRefreshRat
FWIW: I don't try to use randr directly to set up panning. I do it
either through xorg.conf or xorg.conf.d/50-monitor.conf because I'm
usually controlling DPI via DisplaySize, limiting VertRefresh to 60 or
75, turning DPMS & DDC off, and turning DefaultModes on. It would be
nice if TargetRefreshRat
For the record, openSUSE Factory (devel) is currently @ 1.12.2, where
panning for me is working OK with radeon/rv200, but not with nouveau or
intel drivers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
For the record, openSUSE Factory (devel) is currently @ 1.12.2, where
panning for me is working OK with radeon/rv200, but not with nouveau or
intel drivers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
42 matches
Mail list logo
