[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1990373] [NEW] Sync intel-media-driver 22.5.1+dfsg1+really22.4.3-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2022-09-21 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported: Please sync intel-media-driver 22.5.1+dfsg1+really22.4.3-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current kinetic version 22.5.1+dfsg1-1: intel-media-driver (22.5.1+dfsg1+really22.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/: Build without -Werror -

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1686057] [NEW] Sync libdrm 2.4.80-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)

2017-04-25 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported: Please sync libdrm 2.4.80-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current artful version 2.4.76-1: libdrm (2.4.80-1) experimental; urgency=medium * New upstream release. * Bump libdrm-amdgpu1's and libdrm-etnaviv1's symbols and shlibs. * Remov

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1214564] Re: Disappearing mouse cursor after nvidia packages update.

2016-12-07 Thread Rico Tiongson
I'm also experiencing this bug. But in my case, my mouse is returns after 3 minutes on the first 1-2 reboots. On the 3rd reboot, my mouse is completely back. Using Ubuntu 64-bit and recently updated to NVIDIA 375.20 proprietary driver. Using linux kernal 4.4.0.53 -- You received this bug notific

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1581665] Re: /usr/local/lib/libinput.so.10: version `LIBINPUT_0.20.0' not found

2016-05-24 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Simply a manual and unsupported install of libinput into /usr/local -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libinput in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581665 Title: /usr/local/lib/libinput.so.10: version `LIBINPUT_0.20.0' not

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1563866] Re: Icons displaying two times in Unity launcher when double click the application

2016-03-30 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => unity (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563866 Title: Icons displaying two times in Unity launcher when double click the application

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 518056] Re: cedilla appears as accented c (ć instead of ç) when typing 'c

2015-04-01 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
@gunnarhj: The syntax of cedilla-brazil.sh is erroneous. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libx11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518056 Title: cedilla appears as accented c (ć instead of ç) when typing 'c To manage n

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1426996] [NEW] $ Ubuntu-bug xorg

2015-03-01 Thread Rico
Public bug reported: mi da sempre errore all'apertura di ubuntu ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+7ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-31.41-generic 3.16.7-ckt5 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-31-generic i686 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.2

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1418128] [NEW] Sync libvdpau 0.9-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)

2015-02-04 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported: Please sync libvdpau 0.9-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current vivid version 0.8-3: libvdpau (0.9-1) experimental; urgency=medium * New upstream release. * Drop patches cherry-picked from upstream git. * hardening.patch: Remove, fixe

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1408593] Re: X server disables acceleartion or turns off output (makes screen black) after kernel upgrade to v3.18 (Ubuntu Vivid)

2015-01-27 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d472fcc8379c062bd56a3876fc6ef22258f14a91 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76554#c116 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #76554 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76554 -- You received t

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1056819] Re: There is no libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg:i386 in the xorg-edgers PPA

2012-12-25 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg:i386/amd64 are available and can be both installed ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056819 Title: T

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 950985] Re: FFe: Sync libpciaccess 0.13-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-03-09 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
@Scott: As far as I can tell the linux related changes are only bug fixes. Feature changes are related to OpenBSD and Solaris which shouldn't affect the linux code paths. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libpciaccess in Ubuntu. htt

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 950985] [NEW] FFe: Sync libpciaccess 0.13-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-03-09 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported: Please sync libpciaccess 0.13-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception: Final release of 0.13 after last pre-releases 0.12.902 which is already in precise Changelog entries since current precise version 0.12.902-1: libpciaccess (0.13-1) u

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 918873] [NEW] Sync pixman 0.24.2-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-01-19 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported: Please sync pixman 0.24.2-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current precise version 0.24.0-1: pixman (0.24.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release: - Stable bug fix release from the 0.24 branch. -- Cyril Brulebois Thu, 19 Jan 2

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 782108] [NEW] Sync pixman 0.21.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-05-13 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported: Please sync pixman 0.21.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: There is no actual delta, so it can be synced. Changelog entries since current oneiric version 0.20.2-0ubuntu1: pixman (0.21.8-1) unstable; urgency=low

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2011-04-30 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
For the moment I have installed a Windows Vista Premium 64bits which works fine, and runs Opengl correctly. I will keep trying the latest Long Term Ubuntu anyway, when available, in case... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2011-04-30 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
I observe the same problem with Ubuntu 10.10 Desktop i386 Live. There is no way to reach a clean screen! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-openchrome in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372556 Title: Rec

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 633194] Re: FFe: Sync pixman 0.18.4-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)

2010-09-08 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Patch added: "pixman_0.18.2-1ubuntu1_0.18.4-1.debdiff" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pixman/+bug/633194/+attachment/1557033/+files/pixman_0.18.2-1ubuntu1_0.18.4-1.debdiff -- FFe: Sync pixman 0.18.4-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/6

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 633194] [NEW] FFe: Sync pixman 0.18.4-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)

2010-09-08 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported: Please sync pixman 0.18.4-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: 100_check_read_accessor.patch is upstream now and included in this new upstream source Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception: this version is a bug-

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 606244] Re: X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition

2010-07-16 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Attachment added: "dmesg.WITHFRAMBUFFER" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52029316/dmesg.WITHFRAMBUFFER -- X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606244 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 606244] Re: X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition

2010-07-16 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Attachment added: "dmesg.FAIL" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52029292/dmesg.FAIL -- X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606244 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-s

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 606244] Re: X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition

2010-07-16 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.FAIL" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52029291/Xorg.0.log.FAIL -- X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606244 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 606244] Re: X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition

2010-07-16 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.WITHFRAMBUFFER" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52029295/Xorg.0.log.WITHFRAMBUFFER -- X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606244 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 606244] [NEW] X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition

2010-07-16 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported: X fails to find a screen. This most likely caused by a race condition which is resolved by including the drm stack into initrd using FRAMEBUFFER=yes with initramfs-tools Maverick development release libdrm 2.4.20-2ubuntu1 linux 2.6.35-8-generic xserver-xorg 2:1.8.1.902-0u

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 406847] Re: [karmic] touchpad no tapping

2009-07-30 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Sorry, I didn't notice this change. -- [karmic] touchpad no tapping https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchp

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 406847] [NEW] [karmic] touchpad no tapping

2009-07-30 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg Tapping only works in gdm. After logging in I'm not able to use tapping function. All other functions are working fine even scrolling. Systems: karmic (i386, 2009-07-30) on HP/Compaq nc4010 karmic (amd64, 2009-07-30) on HP/Compaq 2510p Th

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2009-05-20 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
Sorry, no way to get 9.04 logs, as the system doesn't let reach a command line... But I think I have got something: I have compared the recovery start up with telinit 2 (which fails) and telinit 5 (which works fine), looking at the scripts started in each /etc/rc2.d and /etc/rc5.d. The only diffe

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2009-05-14 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
Produced when screen gets fuzzy ** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26707466/Xorg.0.log.old -- Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2009-05-14 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
Produced when screen gets fuzzy ** Attachment added: "gdm:0.log.1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26707503/gdm%3A0.log.1 -- Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2009-05-14 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
** Attachment added: "Produced when screen gets fuzzy" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26707411/gdm%3A0.log.1 -- Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is s

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2009-05-14 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26707365/Xorg.0.log -- Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in ubu

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2009-05-14 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
** Attachment added: "gdm:0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26707351/gdm%3A0.log -- Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in ubu

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2009-05-14 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26707337/xorg.conf -- Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in ubunt

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 372556] Re: Recovery start+telinit 5 is the only way to start correctly

2009-05-14 Thread Juan Carlos Rico Gil
I have gathered some data which can be helpfull. First lspci.txt is the lspci output in this system. Second xorg.conf is the configuration file for X that is in use. Third two files output during the 'good' run (telinit 5): by X, Xorg.0.log by gdm, gdm:0.log Forth two same files ou