Bug 881046 is about the same xrandr panning and scaling issue in general
- it's not just an Intel server problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877878
Title:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 881046 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881046
Marking as duplicate of #881046 which has links to the upstream bugs and
is confirmed and assigned. This is a bug in xserver upstream and will
affect compiz, GNOME, Unity, KDE, Kubuntu and probably XFCE / Xubu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 881046 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881046
hlb: Marking as dupe of bug 881046 which is confirmed, assigned, and has
an upstream bug.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 881046
Panning in a virtual monitor is not possible after upgrade to
Looks like the regression was introduced when trying to fix a problem
with the mouse going into space outside of the display, when you have
two displays of different sizes joined together. Here's the bug I think
Bryce referred to, and it looks like that broke panning.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Confirmed on Kubuntu oneiric.
** Tags added: kubuntu panning xrandr
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to libxrandr in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878454
Title:
--scale and --panning options do not resize the mouse area
Fundamental issue at X Server level
** Package changed: compiz (Ubuntu) => xorg (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/866065
Title:
Cursor limited after XRANDR with option "--
For clarity - is this fixed in Lucid's kernel? Or is there still farther
to go? I'd like to help you keep a lid on Intel-driver-bashing in the
forum when Lucid is out, but can't figure out if you're expecting this
to work or not.
--
[i945gm] (Needs kernel 2.6.32) DRI2 swapbuffers and page flippin
Jerry, think Bryce realises that, he's saying can we have a hang bug
reported seperately, get that fixed, and then come back to this bug.
Does that make sense?
Alternate theory meanwhile: kernel 31-RC8 hangs on boot for me, 6 and 7
were fine. So if you've moved forward to a later RC since your ori
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 376092 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376092
Bryce: Yep, I think this is now effectively a dupe, and I'd forgotten
this only affected UXA. Thanks, another one off the list!
--
High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11
https://bugs.la
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 376092 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376092
Bryce: Yep, I think this is now effectively a dupe, and I'd forgotten
this only affected EXA. Thanks, another one off the list!
--
High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11
https://bugs.la
I ran your patched kernel for quite some time and it was perfectly
stable. I moved X on to xorg-edgers version because I was curious about
a few other bugs...
I've just been looking into going back a few versions and doing the
testing as you suggest. However my .28 kernel is now
linux-image-2.6.2
Sorry to double-post but just realised I lied. :-)
Since the bug was filed against 2.6.28-11 and we've gone around it by
going to .30... what we gonna do about a fix for official Jaunty?
--
High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367377
You r
Been looking through changelogs for the version Bob Manners and I have
been going through... I can see there are several memory leaks that
might have been the culprit that have been fixed recently, or that had
been fixed in drivers way in advance of what I was running.
Bob: your bug, but suggest w
There were lots of changes to this area of DRM in 2.6.30rc7 and rc8 -
could be worth trying this kernel and seeing if the problem goes away?
If it does I don't think it will be too hard to identify the exact
changes which fixed it...
--
High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11
OK. Can't try the current (20090603) xorg-edgers build for performance
because it just plain won't run games, but I believe this is a known
problem.
Meanwhile, on the latest Jaunty proposed versions UXA is about half the
speed of EXA on a couple of games. Which bug are you using to track UXA
perfo
@Bryce: Fair comment, but for Jaunty, if you enable UXA to remove the
EXA-freeze bug, you get the UXA-fonts bug instead - which does stop you
working since everything becomes unreadable.
What we need is an SRU which fixes or works around BOTH bugs...
--
[i945] (Needs UXA) X freezes a few minutes
There absoutely are freeze bugs in UXA and EXA both in the default
Jaunty configuration, so we need an SRU of some type, even if it's a bug
that affects performance.
The good news is that a whole bunch of them are fixed, either in kernel
updates or in updates in -proposed - so with a little time d
17 matches
Mail list logo
