[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-12-19 Thread ilna
Indian Art, Sorry, the problem you have resolved and decribed here(citing Giblet5) has absolutely nothing related to the bug. -- [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-06 Thread ilna
I have noticed the same degrading as you, Hhewbert , but I guess it is related to changings in kernel's scheduler. Besides less DE responsivity I catched some other slowdown. Say, MPD player clicks when some JVM application is eating CPU actively (such building NetBeans from sources). -- [i965]

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-06 Thread ilna
(ugh.. Sorry for typo in your name, Hewbert!) -- [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is the registrant for xf86-video-intel.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-04 Thread ilna
Cian, look at '/dev/dri' - have you something there? Probably it is another problem with workaround to reinstall libdrm2 and libdrm-intel1. There is a dedicated bug wrt /dev/dri problem (try to search). -- [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 430876] Re: /dev/dri devices are absent after recent update (intel card)

2009-09-18 Thread ilna
After today upgrade I was forced reinstall drm again - there was the only (I think) reason responsible for the issue, and it is initsrcipts/sysv package group. -- /dev/dri devices are absent after recent update (intel card) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430876 You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 430876] Re: /dev/dri devices are absent after recent update (intel card)

2009-09-18 Thread ilna
** Attachment added: dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32017263/dmesg.txt -- /dev/dri devices are absent after recent update (intel card) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libdrm in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 430876] Re: /dev/dri devices are absent after recent update (intel card)

2009-09-18 Thread ilna
** Attachment added: lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32017276/lspci.txt -- /dev/dri devices are absent after recent update (intel card) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to libdrm in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 430876] Re: /dev/dri devices are absent after recent update (intel card)

2009-09-18 Thread ilna
Have attached lspci and dmesg outs. Unfortunately I have not bad: X11 log at the moment (old one is also good). But I guess it isn't needed at all: the problem takes place just at those state when 'ls /dev/dri/' finds nothing - it isn't needed to start X at all, and, in fact, I boot in console

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 431178] Re: xorg is slow since new upstart

2009-09-18 Thread ilna
Daniel, bug 430876 -- xorg is slow since new upstart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 421067] Re: mesa 7.6.0~git20090817.7c422387-0ubuntu3 with intel G965 hangs

2009-09-01 Thread ilna
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 419264 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419264 Bryce, you are right, thanks! ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 419264 Uses 100% CPU with latest mesa/libdrm update -- mesa 7.6.0~git20090817.7c422387-0ubuntu3 with intel G965 hangs

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 421067] Re: mesa 7.6.0~git20090817.7c422387-0ubuntu3 with intel G965 hangs

2009-08-29 Thread ilna
Bryce, I was surprised you have added 'kubunru' tag. So, I have tried 'xinit/usr/bin/fluxbox' - all works fine, thanks! Moreover, say, etracer is ~2x faster rather started from KDE. -- mesa 7.6.0~git20090817.7c422387-0ubuntu3 with intel G965 hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421067 You

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 416073] Re: [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-08-29 Thread ilna
For those who use Kubuntu - at my case this bug is related with that one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/421067 In particular, say, etracer started from fluxbox shows fps ~2x faster rather started from KDE (it's a sin, but glxgears is also ~1.6x faster). -- [karmic][GM965]

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 224404] Re: MTRR is not properly setup on Intel Northbridge Chipset (P35, X38, X48) with more than 3GB RAM and with Memory Remapping Enabled

2009-08-14 Thread ilna
For D. Hugh Redelmeier: thanks for fix! In fact I have resolved the issue with 'enable_mtrr_cleanup' boot option: sudo cat /proc/mtrr reg00: base=0x0 (0MB), size= 2048MB, count=1: write-back reg01: base=0x1 ( 4096MB), size= 2048MB, count=1: write-back reg02: base=0x17c00 (

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 224404] Re: MTRR is not properly setup on Intel Northbridge Chipset (P35, X38, X48) with more than 3GB RAM and with Memory Remapping Enabled

2009-08-14 Thread ilna
For D. Hugh Redelmeier: It's here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7774450postcount=1048 -- MTRR is not properly setup on Intel Northbridge Chipset (P35, X38, X48) with more than 3GB RAM and with Memory Remapping Enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224404 You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 224404] Re: MTRR is not properly setup on Intel Northbridge Chipset (P35, X38, X48) with more than 3GB RAM and with Memory Remapping Enabled

2009-08-12 Thread ilna
For D. Hugh Redelmeier: I have tried to build mtrr-uncover-2009may13.tgz and got: $ make cc -Wall -gmtrr-uncover.c -o mtrr-uncover mtrr-uncover.c:123: error: ‘mtrr_type’ redeclared as different kind of symbol /usr/include/asm/mtrr.h:70: note: previous declaration of ‘mtrr_type’ was here