[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 547187] Re: Small graphics performance

2010-03-26 Thread pijanyadmin
However, support for this graphics card, compared to 9.10 is horrible. -- Small graphics performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/547187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in ubuntu. __

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 547187] Re: Small graphics performance

2010-03-26 Thread pijanyadmin
I installed xserver-xorg-video-ati glxgears 124 frames in 5.0 seconds = 24.774 FPS 184 frames in 5.0 seconds = 36.729 FPS 189 frames in 5.0 seconds = 37.696 FPS even worse. -- Small graphics performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/547187 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 547187] Re: Small graphics performance

2010-03-25 Thread pijanyadmin
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41984960/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41984961/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41984962/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 547187] [NEW] Small graphics performance

2010-03-25 Thread pijanyadmin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg I have a radeon 9550 graphics card. Ubuntu 10.04 glxgears 295 frames in 5.0 seconds = 58.814 FPS 298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.588 FPS 301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.002 FPS 294 frames in 5.0 seconds = 58.664 FPS Work such as Blender is impossible