[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 402260] Re: segfault when running Xdmx

2009-07-23 Thread qe2eqe
In the name of reproducibility, I popped in the Xubuntu 9.04 live cd, and did the following. ubu...@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install Xnest Xdmx ... ubu...@ubuntu:~$ Xdmx :2 -display :0 ... (II) dmx[o0/:0]: 0x3b TrueColor 32b 8b/rgb 256 0xff 0xff00 0x00ff Segmentation fault (core dumped)

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 402260] Re: segfault when running Xdmx

2009-07-23 Thread qe2eqe
Here's the xorg log that's related to the first post. ** Attachment added: xorg.0.log from other machine http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29425042/Xorg.0.else -- segfault when running Xdmx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 402260] [NEW] segfault

2009-07-21 Thread qe2eqe
Public bug reported: I get a segmentation fault when i run xdmx. http://ubuntu.pastebin.com/f66315f80 ^^output of Xdmx :2 -display :1, inside xfce4-terminal Xdmx :2 -noglxproxy -norender -nomulticursor -input dummy -nooffscreenopt -nosubdivprims -noxkb -display :1 +xinerama also fails in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 402260] Re: segfault

2009-07-21 Thread qe2eqe
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29329273/Dependencies.txt -- segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 402260] Re: segfault

2009-07-21 Thread qe2eqe
I just ran a similar command from a different computer, this time, no local X was displaying, and I told it connect to remote display. Same issue. -- segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 397392] [NEW] With no monitor plugged in, xorg uses (known) bad values

2009-07-09 Thread qe2eqe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg I use a KVM switch, and this 1024x768 LCD is all I've used with machine. If the KVM isn't set to the ubuntu channel, X commits to a default value that isn't compatible with this monitor. Maybe it's not a bug, but X should use the last known working

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 397392] Re: With no monitor plugged in, xorg uses (known) bad values

2009-07-09 Thread qe2eqe
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28845810/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: LsHal.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28845811/LsHal.txt ** Attachment added: LsMod.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28845813/LsMod.txt ** Attachment added: LsPci.txt

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 397392] Re: With no monitor plugged in, xorg uses (known) bad values

2009-07-09 Thread qe2eqe
Thanks. Is this an appropriate place to ask the counter-question, I thought ubuntu was trying to get away from xorg.conf, and that's why the new conf looks like a dummy file. On 7/9/09, Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com wrote: There's no way knowing the last working value.. Edit your xorg.conf