Hmm, it seems that magically maybe the last 2.20.x release fixed this
for me. Which is great, of course.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to
** Tags added: resume
** Tags added: vt-switch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055987
Title:
[sna] Need tty switch after screen off to resume display
To
confirmed here
Edward: if you can reproduce the other bug without sna at will, knowing
that sna fixes it is good information for the upstream bug..
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thanks, Timo; good to know. It hasn't seemed consistently reproducible
yet, but I'll try some more.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055987
Title:
[sna] Need
** Attachment removed: DpkgLog.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1055987/+attachment/3340523/+files/DpkgLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
I'm running xorg-edgers right now, on my Ivy Bridge machine, and seeing
this behavior. I don't have SNA turned on in the config file (no
xorg.conf), but it appears to be switched on in those builds:
[18.918] (II) intel(0): SNA initialized with IvyBridge backend
Thanks.
--
You received
Oh, BTW, I'm running edgers to see if bug 966744 still happens. So far
I've only seen this more minor bug, so it might be one behavior or the
other. Or it could be that it masks the 966744 problem, or something,
so I probably shouldn't speculate, oops. Thanks.
--
You received this bug
8 matches
Mail list logo
