[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1328542] Re: [xorg-edgers] OCL-ICD provides a free generic OpenCL implementation, should ubuntu policy be to build applications against this loader vs closed vendor implementation

2014-07-29 Thread Graham Inggs
** Also affects: viennacl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: fglrx-driver (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: ocl-icd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed =

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1328542] Re: [xorg-edgers] OCL-ICD provides a free generic OpenCL implementation, should ubuntu policy be to build applications against this loader vs closed vendor implementation

2014-06-26 Thread Graham Inggs
@Graham libviennacl-dev has a build-depends on libopencl1 (virtual) and does not specify a suggested implementation (although this is against policy, so probably can be filed as a bug against that package) . I believe you are correct that this is against policy, the build-depends should be on

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1328542] Re: [xorg-edgers] OCL-ICD provides a free generic OpenCL implementation, should ubuntu policy be to build applications against this loader vs closed vendor implementation

2014-06-25 Thread Graham Inggs
@Andrey: Which packages are not built against ocl-icd-libopencl1? $ reverse-depends -r trusty ocl-icd-libopencl1 Reverse-Recommends == * bfgminer * wine1.6-amd64 [amd64] * wine1.6-i386 [i386] Reverse-Depends === * clinfo [ppc64el] * erlang-cl [ppc64el] *

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1328542] Re: [xorg-edgers] OCL-ICD provides a free generic OpenCL implementation, should ubuntu policy be to build applications against this loader vs closed vendor implementation

2014-06-25 Thread Andrey Shmakov
@Graham libviennacl-dev has a build-depends on libopencl1 (virtual) and does not specify a suggested implementation (although this is against policy, so probably can be filed as a bug against that package) . opencl loaders *should* be interchangeable if they follow the traditional virtual package