*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
I also tried 4xBilinear, it's better (faster than Gaussian and Mipmaps).
Another tip is to choose normal (instead of any) in the Alpha Blur
Windows setting in Compiz Settings.
I think working on intel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
4xBilinear may be the fastest, but it barely blurs for me. Gaussian is the next
fastest, but it isn't as clean as Mipmap. Mipmap is slowest but looks better
than the others.
This bug shouldn't be a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
Which graphic chip have you got? x4500hd like me?
--
[i965] compiz blur plugin very slow (UXA/EXA)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201264
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 363174 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363174
I agree with Nattgew. A noticable difference even when moving windows,
for example. Very snappy without blur... slow and lagging with blur
enabled. Gaussian is slower than bilinear (which doesn't provide
4 matches
Mail list logo
