** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Importance: Unknown => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
Title:
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Importance: High => Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
Title:
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
This page was last modified on 20 May 2009, at 14:08.
2-Year old page bro! Even the radeon driver has matured significatly since
then.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:31 AM, actionparsnip <
andrew.woodhead...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I'd just like to add:
> http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glxgears
I'd just like to add:
http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glxgears_is_not_a_Benchmark
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
Title:
MASTER: Poor graphics performa
Hi friend it’s looking a nice informative post in this blog . Thanks and like
to share my thought here.
http://www.xigmapro.com/e-commerce-website-design-and-development/";>Ecommerce
Website Design Company
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You
this is not only for intel drivers
804.3 hardy
lspci|grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UniChrome Pro IGP
(rev 01)
this just hit me over the last week
webcam is giving me 1.2 fps
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252
Figured I'd make an update.
Mesa git fixed some issues for me.
unreal tournament isn't hoping around anymore.
Actually is pretty smooth now.
Blender's latest available build still renders outside the container
window but some of the glitches were fixed. You still can't see the
selection window.
http://anholt.livejournal.com/41306.html
()_- [ We do use ut2004. It does stutter with 2.6.31rc (unstable code)
due to a performance improvement that requires a Mesa fix to avoid the
stuttering. The Mesa fix has been undergoing review.]-_()
}-._
He never mentions the fix. I haven't had time to loo
Quote from Storm's URL : " within Mesa there are regressions where we
could not even complete OpenGL tests with the current Karmic stack that
had run fine under Ubuntu 9.04". Although it says the stack has less
glitches, which is at least some improvement.
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on
Just for info:
Intel Linux Graphics On Ubuntu Still Flaky
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_q309_flakes&num=3
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which
I updated 9.10 again today
A new kernel and Intel driver got installed.
2.6.30-10 has lowered performance considerably.
The new upgrades to Xorg have a few issues with external LCD's.
Stepping back to 2.6.30-9 stablized things as long as I didn't push past the
resolution of my laptop's
onboard dis
I updated my system to the latest drivers and X, and it works fine
(better then before to be sure).
No screen flicker. However, when I try to change the brightness through
the shortcut keys on my laptop keyboard, or through the brightness
applet in gnome, the screen flicker and CPU get high, but a
Last time I tested with last intel, X and kernel 2.6.30 (rc7?) versions
available the results were poor and not stable.
Has anyone got it working fine? (no render errors and good fps on
googleearth and tux racer?)
Has anyone got it working fine on a eee 901?
Jose
2009/6/28 Bryce Harrington
> I
I think we can close this one now. The issue is largely resolved in
Karmic, and the commentary on this bug seems to have degenerated past
usefulness. Other bug reports are tracking kernel patches and other
fixes proposed for Jaunty.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Karmic)
2009/6/5 Radu Cristian Fotescu :
> 1. The freedesktop bug #18389 was closed with NOTOURBUG, which does NOT
> solve it.
>
> 2. The freedesktop bug #18389 was opened for openSUSE, so this does NOT
> solve Ubuntu's bug.
>
> 3. As long as Jaunty is affected by this bug, the bug status can NOT be
> Inva
you should try windows 7, it's very neat, been using it since ubuntu started
having issues with video.
The only times I boot back into ubuntu now, are to try and fix the video.
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification
1. The freedesktop bug #18389 was closed with NOTOURBUG, which does NOT
solve it.
2. The freedesktop bug #18389 was opened for openSUSE, so this does NOT
solve Ubuntu's bug.
3. As long as Jaunty is affected by this bug, the bug status can NOT be
Invalid!
I stop using Ubuntu effective now, and I
Radu, please respect the Code of Conduct. The bug status for xf86-video-
intel was set by the Bug Watch Updater to invalid, because the
freedesktop bug #18389 was closed. As you wrote, this bug is well known.
I never said, that this bug does not exist. I am affected of this bug,
too. To solve this
Radu, your comments are inappropriate, please remain civil. Remember
many of the people assisting with people's bugs are volunteers, and
expressing your frustration here (while valid) does not help move things
towards a solution.
In this case Benjamin is correct, and is simply repeating informati
Dear Benjamin MOTU,
Whatever is needed to be "specific" about this bug is written in the Ubuntu
9.04 Release Notes, right here:
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/904#Performance%20regressions%20on%20Intel%20graphics%20cards
"Users of Intel video chipsets have reported performance regr
Zack, please file a new bug report and add all relevant information.
This bug report is too long and not specific enough.
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is the regi
OK. Can't try the current (20090603) xorg-edgers build for performance
because it just plain won't run games, but I believe this is a known
problem.
Meanwhile, on the latest Jaunty proposed versions UXA is about half the
speed of EXA on a couple of games. Which bug are you using to track UXA
perfo
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is the registrant for xf86-video-intel.
J.P. wrote:
> FWIW my ThinkPad R61i had a drastic improvement after upgrading the kernel to
> the 2.6.29 line following the 'optimal' config per this HOWTO:
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1130582
>
> Unfortunately, the text will garble up after suspending/hibernating or
> switching us
I can confirm both: drastic improvement as well as problems after
returning from suspension on my R50e. But it could/should still be
faster and there are still some "minor" glichtes in the screen without
having used suspension.
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.
FWIW my ThinkPad R61i had a drastic improvement after upgrading the kernel to
the 2.6.29 line following the 'optimal' config per this HOWTO:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1130582
Unfortunately, the text will garble up after suspending/hibernating or
switching users. Restarting X solve
@bouazza: we're not quite there yet. In fact, we haven't even begun
talking about catching up to windows. The main reason is that the
graphics drivers for intel are currently (relatively) unstable. If you
read the bug description, intel is doing a major rework of their linux
drivers.
In particular
The reason I'm not satisfied with this "improvement" is that we are just
back to the Hardy performances, so nearly 0% loss and gain on graphics
performances ...
But even on Hardy, Windows games that were smoothly playable under
Windows Vista are totally unplayable now, even with these "improvement
I would call a 4-6X improvement an HUGE improvement. However it was Jaunty (and
Intrepid) that showed a big drop in performances, so with that guide I can use
Compiz and some Wine games again as I did on Hardy. And that is why people
compare Jaunty to Hardy. The modified Jaunty performs better t
Well, when I measure performance improvement, I usually use PPRacer, but
even if the FPS goes from ~5 to ~20~30 ( Intel X3100 card ), I still
think that there's no improvement ...
We have to compare to the Intel graphics performances under Windows XP (
my brother's PC with its Intel 8XX card runs
@bouazza: I means that Tux Racer now runs at 25-35 FPS instead of 1-2 in
Jaunty. Just by adding UXA it was only 10-25 FPS. I followed ALL the
"Bleeding-Edge Configuration" steps in the guide, else the performances was
almost unchanged; but the configuration and the result may depend on your
gra
@bouazza: Yes, I still have crashes, but they're much more infrequent
now (once every 2 days). I did a dist-upgrade after adding the PPA, so
there may have been other packages (most likely mesa) fetched as well.
How are you measuring performance improvement?
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance o
Well, I installed the 2.6.30rc7 kernel, libdrm/libdrm2 and the intel
driver from xorg-edgers .
The rendering errors with Compiz are corrected, I don't even see crashes
now, but still no performances improvements ...
I have an Intel X3100 card, do I need to install another package ? Do I
have to i
@NB : What do you mean with "good performances" ? Good scores which can
compete with Windows XP ?
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is the registrant for xf86-video-in
After I followed this HOW TO, I'm getting good performances:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1130582
On my case (I'm using a 945) I had to upgrate the kernel to 2.6.30 rc
--
MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094
You received this bug notificati
Hello !
@Richard Guo : Are you getting those good performances only using libdrm
and intel driver packages from Xorg Edgers ? Sounds really good !
What about crashes ? I mean, those who freeze the entire system ( not
possible to switch to console mode ), are they still present ?
--
MASTER: Poor
Sounds like the kde session manager may have crashed, stalled and another
copy got loaded.
I'm not experienced enough with the internals of KDE to give you a deffinate
hypothesis.
A lot has changed from 3.5 up to 4.2.
Buntu is starting to become more like Slackware.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:38
Performance is now drastically higher using libdrm 2.4.9 and intel
driver 2.7.1 in UXA mode on a GM965 (PPA: https://launchpad.net/~xorg-
edgers/+archive/ppa). Though glxgears is hovering around 600 fps now
(see reason: http://qa-rockstar.livejournal.com/7869.html), actual 2D
rendering speeds and 3
Hi there,
I've the same problems with kubuntu and jaunty on a minimac with 945G.
After googling around I found different proposals. To get some solutions
to work I opened a file with 'sudo kate' from konsole. Kate was starting
but I got an error-message like this 'Could not start ksmserver. Check
My performance gains reverted after I allowed updates.
I did see that one was xf86-intel-2.6.4 or something to that nature.
I had no freezing on my 945GM. This is a Sony Vaio laptop so for those that
are interested.
It's was a clean Kubuntu 9.04 install with only the kernel added in.
I'm not sure
linux-2.6.30-rc(ANY) solves the problem with speed, but still freezes in
a few (10-20-30) minutes of work in UXA mode. And this time it freezes
not only X desktop, but the whole system -- it's not possible to switch
into console anymore (and yes, DontZap=false).
Upgrading from xorg-edgers (in addi
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30-rc5/linux-
image-2.6.30-020630rc5-generic_2.6.30-020630rc5_i386.deb
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30-rc5/linux-
headers-2.6.30-020630rc5_2.6.30-020630rc5_all.deb
19fps in Neverwinter Nights and ut2004 runs smooth as it did
Why not contact MichaelLaurable at phoronix and have a standard testing
suite made for intel graphics performance, something generic enough that
all who use it will have something more reliable to report on than
glxgears then benchmarking of good vs bad performance would be easier..
--
MASTER: P
43 matches
Mail list logo
