[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2023-01-29 Thread Bil Carry
Keep up the good work. https://grazeapk.com/kame-paradise-apk/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 Title: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA an

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2014-11-13 Thread Rolf Leggewie
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 Title: [X1400] Extra X session

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-05-02 Thread Øyvind Stegard
This is no longer a problem in Ubuntu 10.04 when using (default) radeon driver with KMS. -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-x

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-03 Thread Neil Broomfield
Thanks for the update guyssome usefull information there. I'll consider updating to Lucid RC to see if it fairs any better. -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
I updated Lucid to the latest git code of the -ati driver last week which should have all those commits. I assume those of you still seeing the issue are seeing it on karmic rather than lucid. I've opened a karmic task in case there is interest in backporting the fix (it doesn't look likely that

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-02 Thread Pauli
No. Too much work compared to benefits when there exist nearly working solution. If you cannot use xrandr modelines you should report the bug bugs.freedesktop.org so it gets fixed before lucid. http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/HowToRandR12 for good xrandr configuration help. The performance p

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-02 Thread Neil Broomfield
I tired KMS and can confirm that it seems to resolve this issue, however it currently comes with it's own problems, I’m sure this is because it’s still under heavy development, the most annoying of which was the lack of Mode lines previously available under X control. I posted something on this th

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-02 Thread Øyvind Stegard
Pauli writes: > KMS=Kernel modesetting which you have to enable by passing modeset=1 > to radeon kernel module. KMS driver fixes the bug and the commit you > think about is for KMS case. KMS is still under heavy development and > getting it to working state requires sometimes quite a lot of tweak

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-02 Thread Pauli
KMS=Kernel modesetting which you have to enable by passing modeset=1 to radeon kernel module. KMS driver fixes the bug and the commit you think about is for KMS case. KMS is still under heavy development and getting it to working state requires sometimes quite a lot of tweaking depending of hw. On

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-02 Thread Øyvind Stegard
I agree, it would be nice to get this fixed. Let the driver fallback to shadowfb-technique if DRI-init fails, I'm sure that would help a lot. Guest sessions are next to unusable right now. The strange thing is I remember seeing patches upstream that were meant to revert to non-EXA acceleration tech

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-02-02 Thread Neil Broomfield
Still broken for mewould be really nice if this was fixed, Linux should be a multi-user system, I actually think this is quite important and quite embarrassing. Can we elevate this? -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You rec

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2010-01-06 Thread Geoffrey Pursell
Still broken for me, too. Here's my log. ** Attachment added: "Fresh Xorg.2.log of a guest session" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37523633/Xorg.2.log ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) As

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-10-26 Thread Anakin Starkiller
I can confirm that latest packages from Karmic doesn't solve this bug...still poor 2D performance (scrolling, moving window) for the second user... And as GDM has been upgraded, you can't use anymore the xorg-extra.conf workaround... -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-09-22 Thread Øyvind Stegard
** Attachment added: "Fresh Xorg-log for guest session where EXA is selected when DRI-init fails" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32236449/Xorg.20.log -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You received this bug notification becau

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-09-22 Thread Øyvind Stegard
The patch does not work here. I'm using radeon-driver from git HEAD (master), and an extra guest session still selects EXA, even though it fails to initialize DRI. -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You received this bug notifica

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-09-19 Thread Anakin Starkiller
Any chance to see this fix backported to Jaunty ? -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in ubuntu. _

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-08-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
I've uploaded a patch today for Karmic's -ati which forces use of XAA if DRI is not present, so I believe this should be solved now. If not, please feel free to reopen with a fresh Xorg.0.log. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- [X1400] Ext

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-08-13 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Tags added: jaunty -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in ubuntu. _

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-08-04 Thread Øyvind Stegard
It seems like a work-around for this problem (using XAA in some cases) got fixed upstream in this commit: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/commit/?id=f564460e94c9d0f1cf3ff4b8535481b2b8b4e9c1 -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launch

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-08-03 Thread Øyvind Stegard
Yes, true. And that would be OK, if software rendering was usable at all. But with Jaunty radeon-driver, it's not, with EXA and no DRI. You'd have to switch extra sessions to XAA for ok performance. -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-08-03 Thread Bryce Harrington
I think it's likely mostly to do with extra sessions being limited to software rendering. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You received this bug no

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 361060] Re: [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI

2009-05-13 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Summary changed: - Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI [Jaunty, radeon] + [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI -- [X1400] Extra X sessions very slow because of EXA and no DRI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361060 You received this bug notification bec