[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-02-16 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39268223/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39268224/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39268228/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-02-25 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- return from suspend doesn't restore screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-02-26 Thread Ricard Gelabert
Hi, I also have a Toshiba Tecra M9 and had a failing resume after suspend. However, it might be useful to know that the following command issued from a terminal did the trick neatly: s2ram --force -a 2. The system suspends and recovers correctly. I am using Karmic, with the binary nVidia driver,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-03-05 Thread Ricard Gelabert
** Description changed: After upgrading to Karmic on my Toshiba Tecra M9 laptop, suspend no longer resumes X11. Instead, Xorg consumes 100% CPU and dmesg complains: [ 3542.034191] NVRM: RmInitAdapter failed! (0x26:0x38:1138) [ 3542.034205] NVRM: rm_init_adapter(0) failed [ 3546.168

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-03-05 Thread Ricard Gelabert
Hello Brian, > Ahhh. Excellent detective work. So the question becomes, what does > this mean in terms of generic suspending and gnome[-power-manager]'s > generic suspend functionality? > I see that s2ram is userspace suspending vs. I suppose the default of > kernel suspending. Again, though, I d

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-03-07 Thread Ivan
Hi, same problem here with same HW (tecra M9). The only difference is that I have 64bit version of Karmic: 2.6.31-20-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 8 09:02:26 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Symptoms are exactly the same - suspends fine, but restored only to black screen. Xorg takes most of processor

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-03-08 Thread Ivan
Solved finally. Ricard's comment about s2ram helped greatly, thanks! pm-tools now do not apply any video "quirks" for nvidia cards, but it looks like one is needed for this notebook: --quirk-s3-mode (equivalent to s2ram --apci_sleep=2) To make default suspend working following is needed: 1) Co

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-03-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Given that the files being patched come from pm-utils, I think we need to get some pm-utils attention on this. ** Package changed: xorg-server (Ubuntu) => pm-utils (Ubuntu) -- return from suspend doesn't restore screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522646 You received this bug notification bec

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 522646] Re: return from suspend doesn't restore screen

2010-02-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 12:52 +, Ricard Gelabert wrote: > Hi, Hi Ricard, > I also have a Toshiba Tecra M9 and had a failing resume after suspend. Glad I'm not alone. > However, it might be useful to know that the following command issued > from a terminal did the trick neatly: s2ram --force