Is this fixed in Ubuntu 10.10? If yes please close the bug.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this bug notification because you
Yes, it it is fixed and the new 6.13.1 or 6.13.2 driver should be
back-ported in Lucid.
On 11/5/10, Fabio Pedretti pedre...@eco.unibs.it wrote:
Is this fixed in Ubuntu 10.10? If yes please close the bug.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
Closing. It should be nominated for Lucid to have any chance of being
fixed there.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this bug
@Sebastien - I believe that is the normal procedure, yes.
@Miro - are you able to test with the Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat
beta Live CD?
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this bug notification because you are a
Yes, the problem is gone with 2.6.32, too.
So it's only the driver version. Will you backport the needed code if my
presumption is correct?
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this bug notification because you are a
I'm not an Ubuntu package maintainer but a backport to Lucid is probably
unlikely as it would fall outside the definition of an SRU. You can
monitor the package status at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/xserver-xorg-video-ati
You will probably need to keep using the PPA you mentioned in
That would be handy.
Some info on the xf86-video-ati 6.13.1 driver can be found at
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=ODM5OQ
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this bug notification because you are a
Today I tried 2.6.34 (for Lucid) and the default 1.7 X Server with KMS
Color Tiling enabled to no effect.
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is
So I suppose it's the driver version because the problem is gone now.
I used this PPA - https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates to
update the X.Org packages and there the only update that actually matters is
the radeon driver version which is 6.13.1.
Solved with:
kernel -
Do you want me to test the fix with the default kernel 2.6.32?
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in ubuntu.
Hmm, interesting.
This sounds a bit like John Bridgman's comment which I pasted in the
first part of comment #6.
I have a Radeon 9800 Pro 128Mb. I'm using KMS and can play videos fine
so there must be more to this than just colour tiling.
It would be interesting to know what the difference is
Though I made a clean reinstall of Ubuntu because of the experimental
state of xorg-edgers' PPA packages, I'll retest and see again what is
the situation now.
I'm going to update the packages from:
1. 2.6.35-rc3 - http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-
ppa/mainline/v2.6.35-rc3-maverick/linux-
Colour Tiling in openSUSE 11.3 rc1 is not enabled by default but there are no
such problems with the video decoding (even when Compiz effects are on).
xorg 1.8, kernel 2.6.34 in use.
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You
Note that if you do enable colour tiling you may get the issue described
at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28381
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #28381
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28381
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
I'm going to wait a little. Now the system is running without KMS
support and the performance is pretty much the same as in Ubuntu 9.10.
I'll retest with xorg ver. 1.9 and Kernel ver. 2.6.35 when they're
pulled in the Ubuntu Maverick repo.
Thanks for your efforts, madbiologist!
--
[radeon
xorg.conf is no longer created by default with newer versions of the
xserver. But you can make one - see the beginning of
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Video and also see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/ReleaseNotes#Window%20corruption%20with%20older%20ATI%20graphics%20cards
--
[radeon
In the Phoronix forums I found this post by AMD Linux's John Bridgman:
Note that the KMS performance hits are highly system-specific - eg on
balance my system feels as fast or faster with KMS than with UMS.
I think the limiting factor is CPU power (ie the KMS code uses more CPU
cycles than the
There is sth more. When KMS is on, there is flickering/tearing while
watching videos.
And there is no 'xorg.conf' in '/etc/X11'...
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Nope. No effect (or at least not so apparent) can be seen with 2.6.34
and X Server ver. 1.8.1 rc1.
P.S. Sorry for this question but why the importance of the bug is not
set?
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this
** Summary changed:
- [ati radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
+ [radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
--
[radeon driver] (regression) poor video decoding performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578224
You received this bug notification because
It's worth a try. Besides the initial Radeon power management support
(more of that coming in 2.6.35), kernel 2.6.34 includes several other
Radeon DRM changes, including this one:
commit c9ff04c941d2cd87d27496d7fee8923238bb2ebb
Author: Jean Delvare
Date: Tue May 11 14:01:45 2010 +1000
21 matches
Mail list logo
