[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949600] Re: [MIR] xserver-xorg-video-dummy

2012-08-22 Thread Michael Terry
Approving based on doko's the package itself looks ok for main comment. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-dummy (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-dummy (Ubuntu) Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949600] Re: [MIR] xserver-xorg-video-dummy

2012-08-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
xserver-xorg-video-dummy promoted (needed by xorg-gtest) ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-dummy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-dummy (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949600] Re: [MIR] xserver-xorg-video-dummy

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Terry
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-dummy (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klose (doko) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-dummy in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949600 Title: [MIR]

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949600] Re: [MIR] xserver-xorg-video-dummy

2012-03-12 Thread Matthias Klose
can you use xvfb for that as well? asking because xvfb itself breaks at least once per release cycle, and this would offer an opportunity to test what we actually use on the buildds for testing. the package itself looks ok for main. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949600] Re: [MIR] xserver-xorg-video-dummy

2012-03-12 Thread Chris Halse Rogers
A solution to that will be to make xvfb-run actually spawn an Xorg server with the dummy driver instead of actually using xvfb; that works on the buildds, and has the advantage of actually using the same server as we use. Some things *can't* be tested against xvfb, because the code they're