[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 981420] Re: Regression: Touchpad always stops working on precise iff syndaemon is started

2014-01-10 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Axel Beckert, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? If so, could you please test for this with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 981420] Re: Regression: Touchpad always stops working on precise iff syndaemon is started

2014-01-10 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Christopher M. Penalver wrote: Axel Beckert, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? If so, could you please test for this with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 981420] Re: Regression: Touchpad always stops working on precise iff syndaemon is started

2014-01-10 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-input-synaptics in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981420 Title: Regression:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 981420] Re: Regression: Touchpad always stops working on precise iff syndaemon is started

2014-01-10 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Wishlist ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 981420] Re: Regression: Touchpad always stops working on precise iff syndaemon is started

2012-04-22 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Ahmed Shams wrote: - Regression: Touchpad always stops working on precise iff syndaemon is run + Regression: Touchpad always stops working on precise if syndaemon is running I'm sorry, but that changes the meaning of the phrase. It's iff (i.e. if and only if; c.f. [1]) and it always