On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:43:07PM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> Paul Mundt wrote:
> >This is the syscall() definition in the __USE_MISC case, and it's
> >certainly not limited to SH. There are hardly any users that implement
> >syscall() using varargs, so this will break other places as well.
>
Hi all,
I noticed there was a change here:
http://www.busybox.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/uClibc/Rules.mak?rev=13205&r1=13200&r2=13205
that enabled -fsigned-char for all arches. What was the reasoning
behind this decision? I'm reliably informed that it generates
suboptimal code on our architec
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 8:42 am, Will Newton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed there was a change here:
>
>
http://www.busybox.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/uClibc/Rules.mak?rev=13205&r1=13200&r2=13205
>
> that enabled -fsigned-char for all arches. What was the reasoning
> behind this decision?
Apologies if this is the wrong list.
It seems my xscale big-endian does not recognize binaries compiled by uclibc as
made with the buildroot toolchain.
i.e.
helloworld.c compiles without complaint to:
$ file hello
hello: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, ARM, version 1 (ARM), dynamically linked
(us
On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Samir wrote:
> I am building Tool chain using Build root.
use the buildroot mailing list
-mike
pgpGiDn8fjjnu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
uClibc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
On Wednesday 11 April 2007, Trasti, Jennifer wrote:
> I get: sh: ./hello: No such file or directory
you're probably missing the ldso
-mike
pgpoAI6rUtO24.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
uClibc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin
On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Xuefeng Ren wrote:
> When I use buildroot build my uClinux, i got the following error
> reloc type R_ARM_PC24 unsupported in this context
>
> How to resolve this problem?
err, what ? for uClinux help, e-mail the uClinux mailing list please
-mike
pgp1fkiZJdxqM.pgp
Des
Hello List, this is my first mail, i have some questions about uclibc, excuseme
if it is in documentation, really i dont read it yet,
1. Is possible to compile the kernel with uclibc, somebody has working in it?
2. Is possible to compile Xorg with Uclibc?
3. Is possible to obtain one light vers
Leandro Rache Sanchez wrote:
> Hello List, this is my first mail, i have some questions about uclibc,
> excuseme if it is in documentation, really i dont read it yet,
> 1. Is possible to compile the kernel with uclibc, somebody has working
> in it?
what? Kernel doesn't rely on any *libc at all! b
