Re: Installing headers with 0.9.29 spawns gcc errors

2007-06-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Sunday 24 June 2007 14:34:19 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Hello Rob and all! > > On Friday 22 June 2007 07:14, Rob Landley wrote: > > On Thursday 21 June 2007 18:30:26 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > > The error occurs when the target architecture is not the same as the > > > build/host one. That is, buildin

Re: internal_function problem

2007-06-24 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> Ok to apply as is? > >I think so, give it a go :) Done. Thanks! ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Re: Installing headers with 0.9.29 spawns gcc errors

2007-06-24 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Hello Rob and all! On Friday 22 June 2007 07:14, Rob Landley wrote: > On Thursday 21 June 2007 18:30:26 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > The error occurs when the target architecture is not the same as the > > build/host one. That is, building a i?86-unknown-linux-uclibc on a > > i?86-unknown-linux-{gnu,u

RE: libpthread vs libc dynamic link order

2007-06-24 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> -Original Message- > From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 24 juni 2007 16:42 > To: Joakim Tjernlund > Cc: 'uClibc' > Subject: Re: libpthread vs libc dynamic link order > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > I never got the hang of the hidden_{proto,def} stuff. I think thes

Re: libpthread vs libc dynamic link order

2007-06-24 Thread Bernd Schmidt
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > I never got the hang of the hidden_{proto,def} stuff. I think these > are way overcomplex. I don't see anything complex about hidden_proto/def. All they do is create a hidden version of the symbol (e.g. __GI_pthread_cond_signal) and an exported alias (pthread_cond_sign

RE: libpthread vs libc dynamic link order

2007-06-24 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> -Original Message- > From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 24 juni 2007 14:56 > To: Joakim Tjernlund > Cc: 'uClibc' > Subject: Re: libpthread vs libc dynamic link order > > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >> Is there a reason the forwarding functions in libc are > >> v

RE: internal_function problem

2007-06-24 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> -Original Message- > From: Bernhard Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 24 juni 2007 11:56 > To: Joakim Tjernlund > Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org > Subject: Re: internal_function problem > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 10:27:32AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >> -Original Message--

Re: libpthread vs libc dynamic link order

2007-06-24 Thread Bernd Schmidt
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Is there a reason the forwarding functions in libc are visible to other shared libraries - it seems to me they are just for libc internal use? If not, the patch below seems to fix the problem here. Any other ideas? No other ideas, can't see a reason to export _X fun

Re: internal_function problem

2007-06-24 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 10:27:32AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Bernhard Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: den 23 juni 2007 22:07 >> To: Joakim Tjernlund >> Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org >> Subject: Re: internal_function problem >> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007

RE: internal_function problem

2007-06-24 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> -Original Message- > From: Bernhard Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 23 juni 2007 22:07 > To: Joakim Tjernlund > Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org > Subject: Re: internal_function problem > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 04:54:27PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > >It is internal to uCli