On 9/28/07, Bernhard Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 05:14:32PM -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
>
> >Is there to be a release of 0.9.28.4 with this fix?
> >I currently cannot use 0.9.29 due to obscure bugs that vanish when I
> >simply change uClibc to 0.9.28.3.
>
> What kind of
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 05:14:32PM -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
>Is there to be a release of 0.9.28.4 with this fix?
>I currently cannot use 0.9.29 due to obscure bugs that vanish when I
>simply change uClibc to 0.9.28.3.
What kind of bugs do you see with 0.9.29?
Do you have some small testcases that
On 9/28/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 September 2007, bin sun wrote:
> > how to solve it?
>
> it's already been fixed in svn
> -mike
>
Is there to be a release of 0.9.28.4 with this fix?
I currently cannot use 0.9.29 due to obscure bugs that vanish when I
simply c
On Wednesday 19 September 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> attached patch for the ld.so checks that during symbol lookup
> process, the DSO has an hash table, otherwise we need to skip
> over the next into the list.
merged, thanks
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> This patch will fix a problem when the same host is defined with both IPv4
> and IPv6 entries in /etc/hosts. Previous only the first of these host would
> work, as uClibc would read the /etc/hosts file from top to bottom, failing
> if th
On Thursday 27 September 2007, bin sun wrote:
> how to solve it?
it's already been fixed in svn
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
