A proposal for a DEVELOPERS file.
Active Developers List
Note: For the hard of thinking, this list is meant to remain in alphabetical
order. If you could add yourselves to it in alphabetical order that would be
so much easier.
P: Person
E: Person's email address
W: Web-page with status/info
A:
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 09:11 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> A proposal for a DEVELOPERS file.
>
> plain text document attachment (DEVELOPERS)
> Active Developers List
>
> Note: For the hard of thinking, this list is meant to remain in alphabetical
> order. If you could add yourselves to it in alp
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:47:08AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 01:26 +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>>> I think it is important knowing this mapping, otherwise some
>>> misunderstanding
>>> may happens when replying to svn commit message.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: kraj
> Date: 2008-07-11 01:02:04 -0700 (Fri, 11 Jul 2008)
> New Revision: 22772
>
> Log:
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Append the objects.
>
>
> Modified:
>branches/uClibc-nptl/libc/Makefile.in
>
>
> Changeset:
> Modified: branches/uClib
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> I'd like to highlight that we need to fix the testsuite build system.
> I've sent a patch recently putting together some suggestions by Bernard,
> Bernd and others. I'd like to have it reviewed so that it can be merged in.
I had missed that in the old thread. The patch
Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
> Hi all,
> The following patch solve several locale multibyte tests failures.
> It has been tested and works fine.
> The patch applies to the latest trunk revision.
>
> Any comment are welcome.
>
> Best Regards,
> Filippo.
>
> This patch fixes several locale tests:
>
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>
>> I'd like to highlight that we need to fix the testsuite build system.
>> I've sent a patch recently putting together some suggestions by
>> Bernard, Bernd and others. I'd like to have it reviewed so that it can
>> be merged in.
>
> I had missed
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:08:40PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Sounds like your revision 22684 broke the auto-testers since a plain
$ make check
doesn't work (anymore? Not sure if it worked before, i suspect it did).
We need at least (Makefile.in):
-test check:
+test check: test_compile
Also,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:41:42PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:08:40PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>
>Sounds like your revision 22684 broke the auto-testers since a plain
>$ make check
>doesn't work (anymore? Not sure if it worked before, i suspect it did).
>
>We ne
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:08:40PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>
> Sounds like your revision 22684 broke the auto-testers since a plain
> $ make check
> doesn't work (anymore? Not sure if it worked before, i suspect it did).
>
> We need at least (Makefile.in):
> -test
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:41:42PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:08:40PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like your revision 22684 broke the auto-testers since a plain
>> $ make check
>> doesn't work (anymore? Not sure if it worked
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 05:08:40PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like your revision 22684 broke the auto-testers since a plain
>> $ make check
>> doesn't work (anymore? Not sure if it worked b
12 matches
Mail list logo
