Hi,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:35:24PM -0400, Corinna Schultz wrote:
>I noticed this difference between glibc and uclibc, in the fadvise
>code (I'm trying to track down a bug on a ppc32 machine).
>
>Why the difference in the number of arguments? I don't know too much
>about the system call mec
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 02:18:03PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> Just to make sure i understand correctly:
>>
>> - If a reentrant function exists then you want the non-reentrant func to
>> be optional (via a central knob).
>> - If non-reentrant funcs are off then they a
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:35:24PM -0400, Corinna Schultz wrote:
>> I noticed this difference between glibc and uclibc, in the fadvise
>> code (I'm trying to track down a bug on a ppc32 machine).
>>
>> Why the difference in the number of arguments? I don
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Author: vda
>>> Date: 2008-04-09 12:51:18 -0700 (Wed, 09 Apr 2008)
>>> New Revision: 21683
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Factor out the core of vprintf() into separate function
>>> vprintf_internal, so that:
>>> * vprintf() does loc
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 02:12:51PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>> Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
Hi all,
The following patch solve several locale multibyte tests failures.
It has been tested and works fine.
The patch ap
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:06:58AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Author: carmelo
>Date: 2008-09-09 05:06:58 -0700 (Tue, 09 Sep 2008)
>New Revision: 23365
>
>Log:
>Hush compiler for extern inline warnings by using
>__extern_inline macro, this also makes gcc 4.3 happy.
>(Taken from NPTL branch)
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:06:58AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: carmelo
>> Date: 2008-09-09 05:06:58 -0700 (Tue, 09 Sep 2008)
>> New Revision: 23365
>>
>> Log:
>> Hush compiler for extern inline warnings by using
>> __extern_inline macro, this also m
Hi,
I tried compiling uClibc-0.9..29 for MIPS32 Big endian arch.
Cross Compiler used - mips-linux-gcc 3.4.4
Host Distro - Fedora Core 4
Kernel Headers used = mips-linux-2.6.15
First Error I get is
AS lib/crti.o
libc/sysdeps/linux/mips/crti.S:109:2: invalid preprocessing directive #APP
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:45:39PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 02:18:03PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>>> Just to make sure i understand correctly:
>>>
>>> - If a reentrant function exists then you want the non-reentrant func to
>>> b
gargs wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am cross compiling a program that is known to work on various other
> uClinux platforms, to target blackfin.
>
> When I compile using the blackfin-toolchain-uclibc-default
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and debug the code using gdb, before the segmentation
> fault, I get num
Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 02:44:47PM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
>>> I've updated the previous patch to keep into account both suggestions
>>> made by Mike and Paul.
>>> A brief explanation of the changes follows:
>>>
>> did you have time to look at this ?
>>
>> If accepted, ma
11 matches
Mail list logo