Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Corinna Schultz wrote:
Quoting Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
a colleague of mine is right now working to produce a patch for
posix_fadvise to fix all LTP tests using posix_fadvise[64].
Indeed LTP
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 01:14:54 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Monday 15 September 2008 10:41:42 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
Would anyone like to speculate why make clean and even make
distclean leave tons of .o and .so files in libm and such?
$ find
Hi,
Rob Landley a écrit :
IIRC
there have been some issues in the past... so, unless we are totally
sure, we need to keep the working/stable and old linuxthreads.old.
No, what we do is we keep the 0.9.29 tarball around and if people have bugs
trying to use 0.9.30 they _report_ them to
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
2) Does it actually have anything to do with nptl?
Nothing, just dynamic linker, and obviously your compiler has to
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Matthieu CASTET
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who said anything about NPTL? Right now, in 0.9.29, there's LINUXTHREADS_OLD
and there's a second implementation of Linuxthreads that most people haven't
been testing because they're still on LINUXTHREADS_OLD. There's
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 01:23:37 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
Ok.
2) Does it actually have anything to do with nptl?
Nothing, just dynamic linker, and obviously your compiler
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:28:19PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Well, we could ship now with a -rc1. Adding bug fixes as someone have
Consider trunk the RC. bugs.uclibc.org has quite some stuff that
currently does not work and also there were reports on this very
list (e.g. the glob()
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:28 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 01:23:37 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
[SNIP]
IIRC
there have been some issues in the
Will Newton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to another.
2) Does it actually have anything to do with nptl?
Nothing, just dynamic linker, and obviously your
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:28:19PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Well, we could ship now with a -rc1. Adding bug fixes as someone have
Consider trunk the RC. bugs.uclibc.org has quite some stuff that
currently does not work and also there were reports on
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 01:03:15PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:28 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 01:23:37 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
1) How platform specific is it?
Fully, TLS relocations are different from one arch to
On Sep 16, 2008, at 3:22 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 05:30:46PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote:
Hello all,
I submitted this as a bug report on uclibc.org
(http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4994). I wanted to be sure
that it
Can you reproduce it with current
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 01:44:43PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:28:19PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Well, we could ship now with a -rc1. Adding bug fixes as someone have
Consider trunk the RC. bugs.uclibc.org has quite some
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 13:55 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 01:03:15PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:28 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 01:23:37 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
1) How platform
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
No, what we do is we keep the 0.9.29 tarball around and if people have bugs
trying to use 0.9.30 they _report_ them to us. If they want to use the old
threading code, they can use the old version of the library. If they want
the new features, then they help us find
15 matches
Mail list logo
