Re: Internal compiler error building m68k.

2008-09-30 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:28:57PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >On Monday 29 September 2008 10:56:04 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:55:53AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >> >So with the attached .config, building last night's svn snapshot, is >> > anybody else seeing this:

Re: PATCH: disable LINUXTHREADS_OLD in menuconfig.

2008-09-30 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:26:05PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >On Monday 29 September 2008 11:04:27 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:36:32PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: >> >On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:57:20 -0500 >> > >> >Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>

Re: PATCH: disable LINUXTHREADS_OLD in menuconfig.

2008-09-30 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:26:26PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:36:32PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: >>>On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:57:20 -0500 >>>Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: PATCH: disable LINUXTHREADS_OLD in menuconfig.

2008-09-30 Thread H.Heinold
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:26:26PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > LT old is stable and has been used over the years. IMO before we > depricate it we should make sure that LT.new works on all platforms. I > dont know how much testing LT.new has received so far. In my > experience whenever I tried it on mi

Re: PATCH: disable LINUXTHREADS_OLD in menuconfig.

2008-09-30 Thread Matthieu CASTET
H.Heinold a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:26:26PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> LT old is stable and has been used over the years. IMO before we >> depricate it we should make sure that LT.new works on all platforms. I >> dont know how much testing LT.new has received so far. In my >> experience

[PATCH] all arches: c89 touchup

2008-09-30 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Hi, To be gentle to c89 bootstrap-compilers the attached patch does basically s/\/\/\(.*\)/\/*\1 *\//g The corresponding issue is http://bugs.uclibc.org/view.php?id=5194 The reporter sees this with gcc-4.2.4 without passing -std=c89 to the compiler (i.e. uses the defaults) and as such i find it

Re: [PATCH] all arches: c89 touchup

2008-09-30 Thread Chase Douglas
On Sep 30, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: To be gentle to c89 bootstrap-compilers the attached patch does basically s/\/\/\(.*\)/\/*\1 *\//g Just to clarify for reading, the replacement could be noted as s#//\(.* \)#/*\1 */#g. Basically, turning the single line style comment

Re: [PATCH] all arches: c89 touchup

2008-09-30 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 02:10:11PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > On Sep 30, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> To be gentle to c89 bootstrap-compilers the attached patch does >> basically s/\/\/\(.*\)/\/*\1 *\//g > > Just to clarify for reading, the replacement could be noted as s

Strange behaviour with 0.9.29-snapshot and poptop

2008-09-30 Thread Pirmin Walthert
Hello I'm creating a uclibc/busybox based rourter and came across strange things the last two days. With 0.9.29 and linuxthreads.old everything works well (lighttp, dropbear, fast-cgi, gpg, ...) except for asterisk that is craching from time to time (the same version that runs absolutely stable

Re: Internal compiler error building m68k.

2008-09-30 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:28:57PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >>On Monday 29 September 2008 10:56:04 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:55:53AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >>> >So with t

Re: Strange behaviour with 0.9.29-snapshot and poptop

2008-09-30 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Pirmin Walthert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I'm creating a uclibc/busybox based rourter and came across strange > things the last two days. > > With 0.9.29 and linuxthreads.old everything works well (lighttp, > dropbear, fast-cgi, gpg, ...) except for ast

Re: POSIX timer functions

2008-09-30 Thread Khem Raj
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:52 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I noticed there are 2 versions of the POSIX timer functions - one in librt > and the other in linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread. The one in sysdeps/pthread > supports SIGEV_THREAD notification and I wanted to use it but I can't seem >

Re: Internal compiler error building m68k.

2008-09-30 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 02:12:46 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:28:57PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > >On Monday 29 September 2008 10:56:04 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:55:53AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > >> >So with the attached .

Re: Internal compiler error building m68k.

2008-09-30 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 21:06:14 Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:28:57PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > >>On Monday 29 September 2008 10:56:04 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > >>> On Sun, S

Re: Strange behaviour with 0.9.29-snapshot and poptop

2008-09-30 Thread Pirmin Walthert
Yes I do. Attached my config (the one for 0.9.29 is almost the same except for the new config options) Regards, Pirmin On Die, 2008-09-30 at 19:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Pirmin Walthert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > > > I'm creating a uclibc/busybox

Re: [PATCH] all arches: c89 touchup

2008-09-30 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > To be gentle to c89 bootstrap-compilers the attached patch does > basically s/\/\/\(.*\)/\/*\1 *\//g > > The corresponding issue is > http://bugs.uclibc.org/view.php?id=5194 > > The reporter sees this with gcc-4.2.4 without passing -std=c89 to > the comp