So as a second level smoke test, I tried to build binutils 2.17 under a uClibc
system made from the 10/04 snapshot, and arm died with:
/home/firmware/firmware-224a724868f3/build/temp-i586/binutils/libiberty/strsignal.c:553:
error: conflicting types for 'psignal'
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
For what it's worth, using the linuxthreads.old stuff, the 10/04 nightly
Unfortunately i have _no_ idea what revision that would be.
snapshot built for armv4l, armv5l, i586, i686, x86-64, m68k, mips, mipsel,
sh4, powerpc, and sparc.
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 11:44:42PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On (27/08/08 11:17), Kevin Day wrote:
gcc-4.3.1 seems to need fenv.h, or more specifically information from
within bits/fenv.h.
This is not really accurate, libbid needs it.
Thats it, GCC-4.3.1 now continues to compile past: FE_INEXACT
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Sent: den 6 oktober 2008 10:24
To: Rob Landley
Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Rob Landley
Hi Carmelo.
Thanks for the hint, Yes SVN:Trunk does solve the memcpy build issue it
would seem.
I have another issue I've not been able to figure out correctly.
With Support global constructors and destructors turned off, uClibc
doesn't seem to build crti.o and crtn.o, yet the linker still looks
Hi,
ping.
Any comments from people who care about thread ?
As a reminder:
- http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4994
- http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-March/019187.html
It could be nice to take a look before 0.9.30 release.
cheers,
Fathi
___
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
And do not forget to actually tag the release in the repository...
The release will be tagged and will be copied to a new stable branch,
yes.
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 08:15:40AM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Corinna Schultz wrote:
These changes are based on the glibc code that handles ppc32. This
probably shouldn't be in the common dir, but I am unfamiliar with how
to add code into the arch-specific dir. I am also unsure about the
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 6 oktober 2008 14:13
To: Peter Kjellerstedt
Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: 10/04 snapshot good -rc2 material.
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
And do not
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:22:32PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
Not sure if I made myself clear, but I was meaning tagging -rc2
(i.e., just like the old tag tags/uClibc_0_9_29_rc1 for 0.9.29rc1).
what for?
trunk is in kind of bugfix-only mode ATM and the rc's are extremely
short lived.
Kieran Bingham wrote:
Hi Carmelo.
Thanks for the hint, Yes SVN:Trunk does solve the memcpy build issue it
would seem.
fine.
I have another issue I've not been able to figure out correctly.
With Support global constructors and destructors turned off, uClibc
doesn't seem to build crti.o
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
I'm not so aware of not elf format... if I guess correctly sh2a doesn't
use elf format (as from -Wl,-elf2flt).
sh-elf would build fine, not sure why you are ( or trying to) use
elf2flat?
If __UCLIBC_FORMAT_SHARED_FLAT__ is not
2008/10/6 Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which is the target file format used to build uclibc.
I'm not so aware of not elf format... if I guess correctly sh2a doesn't use
elf format (as from -Wl,-elf2flt).
indeed
UCLIBC_FORMAT_FLAT=y
If I build with Support global constructors and
Hi Bernhard,
2008/10/6 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
I'm not so aware of not elf format... if I guess correctly sh2a doesn't
use elf format (as from -Wl,-elf2flt).
sh-elf would build fine, not sure why you are (
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:26:24PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
Hi Bernhard,
2008/10/6 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
I'm not so aware of not elf format... if I guess correctly sh2a doesn't
use elf format (as from
On Monday 06 October 2008 03:24:19 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 03:35:50AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
For what it's worth, using the linuxthreads.old stuff, the 10/04 nightly
Unfortunately i have _no_ idea what revision that would be.
Each snapshot contains all the
On Monday 06 October 2008 05:04:20 Fathi Boudra wrote:
Hi,
ping.
Any comments from people who care about thread ?
As a reminder:
- http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4994
- http://uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2008-March/019187.html
It could be nice to take a look before 0.9.30 release.
On Monday 06 October 2008 07:12:34 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
And do not forget to actually tag the release in the repository...
The release will be tagged and will be copied to a new stable branch,
yes.
Just FYI, I
18 matches
Mail list logo