Originally, uClibc provided a build wrapper that let people use their existing
compilers to link programs against uClibc, by rewriting the command line
arguments before calling gcc, but this was abandoned for the following
reason:
Long ago in the dark ages, gcc introduced libgcc.a as a place
On Sunday 26 October 2008 00:56:26 Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 01:47:48 Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
On Monday 20 October 2008 22:25:37 Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:
5. In the bugged case, the daemonized process did not
actually die, it
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Hi,
__syscall_rt_sigaction should accept kernel_sigaction instead on
sigaction, as declared into the bit/kernel_sigaction.h header.
Indeed, each libc function that invoke it, are passing a
kernel_sigaction pointer.
Attached patch tries to fix it.
Cheers,
Carmelo
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I know - we have taken our time. After quite a long period of
general improvement all over the place we are pleased to announce
uClibc-0.9.30-rc2.
The release candidate 2 can be downloaded as usual
Rob Landley wrote:
Could you post your simple test program? I tried to come up with one
(attached), built it with:
i686-gcc thread-hello2.c -lpthread --static
And it worked exactly the same way on gcc and on uClibc (with svn 23784).
My uClibc .config is also attached.
My program
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
what are the compilers prerequisite for this release ?
(it seems gcc-3.4.6 is not supported anymore)
I'm usually using the current release. gcc-3.x is not supported since
quite some time now. If it works for you then fine,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
what are the compilers prerequisite for this release ?
(it seems gcc-3.4.6 is not supported anymore)
I'm usually using the current release.
So svn 23660 broke arm with my .config, but if I change my .config from
MALLOC=y to MALLOC_STANDARD=y it works again.
Does anybody understand the difference between the MALLOC
and MALLOC_SIMPLE options? The make help is not being useful here.
Off to try MALLOC_SIMPLE...
Rob
On Sunday 26 October 2008 14:38:42 Christian MICHON wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
what are the compilers prerequisite for this release ?
(it seems gcc-3.4.6 is not
