Re: [PATCH] Get rid of the ARM variant choice in the menuconfig

2009-04-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:46:38 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > The patch also removes setting the CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for endianness for the > same reason, although the menuconfig entries are still there. iirc, it is possible to build a toolchain that supports both big and little endian simultaneously. i b

Re: [PATCH] Get rid of the ARM variant choice in the menuconfig

2009-04-07 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Hello All! (patch attached, now) Description: As previously suggested, here is a patch that gets rid of the ARM variant choice in the menuconfig. The patch also removes setting the CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for endianness for the same reason, although the menuconfig entries are still there.

[PATCH] Get rid of the ARM variant choice in the menuconfig

2009-04-07 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Hello All! Description: As previously suggested, here is a patch that gets rid of the ARM variant choice in the menuconfig. The patch also removes setting the CFLAGS/LDFLAGS for endianness for the same reason, although the menuconfig entries are still there. This patch is just a pr

Re: Cortex A8 support for uclibc

2009-04-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 16:09:08 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 21:14:36 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i dont think we should keep enabling lazy people. either the right > > options are selected by gcc in their toolchain, or they should manually > > add the -mcpu or whatever flags to

Re: Cortex A8 support for uclibc

2009-04-07 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Hector, All, On Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:31:07 Hector Oron wrote: > > I'm all for throwing away this mess as well. As new variants arrive, we'll > > add more of this stuff. And when one will try to compile with a gcc that - > > is not

Re: Cortex A8 support for uclibc

2009-04-07 Thread Hector Oron
Hi Yann, > I'm all for throwing away this mess as well. As new variants arrive, we'll > add more of this stuff. And when one will try to compile with a gcc that > is not recent enough, the -mcpu and -mtune options will not be recognised, > and the build will break, and we'll be blamed for that. I

Re: Cortex A8 support for uclibc

2009-04-07 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Mike, All, On Tuesday 07 April 2009 21:14:36 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 14:29:06 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > Of course the processor variant we're building uClibc to run on matters! > that's the decision of the compiler and/or user, not uClibc. building uClibc > with a differe

Re: Cortex A8 support for uclibc

2009-04-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 06:48:07 Sagar Borikar wrote: On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sagar Borikar wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:26:33 Sagar Borikar wrote: >>> Just wanted to check whether cortex A8 (ARM) is supported in uClibc? >>

Re: Cortex A8 support for uclibc

2009-04-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 14:29:06 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 08:55:25 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:26:33 Sagar Borikar wrote: > > > Just wanted to check whether cortex A8 (ARM) is supported in uClibc? > > > > uClibc doesnt care what ARM variant you're u

Re: Cortex A8 support for uclibc

2009-04-07 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Hello all! On Tuesday 07 April 2009 08:55:25 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:26:33 Sagar Borikar wrote: > > Just wanted to check whether cortex A8 (ARM) is supported in uClibc? > > uClibc doesnt care what ARM variant you're using. it does have optional > support for things l

Re: uClibc++: bug in map::operator[]

2009-04-07 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:39:13AM +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > >> Olivier Hochreutiner wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I am facing a problem with the uClibc++ implementation of std::map, >>> which can be illustrated with the following code: >>> >> uClibc++ is not

Re: Cortex A8 support for uclibc

2009-04-07 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 04:18:07PM +0530, Sagar Borikar wrote: >resending to the list > >Sagar >On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sagar Borikar wrote: >> resending to list. >> >> Sagar >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sagar Borikar >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Mike Frysinge

Re: Cortex A8 support for uclibc

2009-04-07 Thread Sagar Borikar
resending to the list Sagar On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sagar Borikar wrote: > resending to list. > > Sagar > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sagar Borikar > wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:26:33 Sagar Borikar wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Elf loader unable to load shared libraries.

2009-04-07 Thread Groleo Marius
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Friday 27 March 2009 08:58:07 Groleo Marius wrote: >> I had some problems compiling and later, using shared libraries from >> uClibc-0.9.30.1 on a Coldfire M5485 processor. >> >> The attached patches fixes the problems I've encountered: > > Wel