On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bernhard,
is not possible to receive git=push notificaation by emails as we
had for svn commit ?
The post-recieve-email hook in the git contrib directory should do
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 05:24:50 Will Newton wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
is not possible to receive git=push notificaation by emails as we
had for svn commit ?
The post-recieve-email hook in the git contrib directory should do
what you want.
Ian
-Original Message-
From: uclibc-boun...@uclibc.org [mailto:uclibc-boun...@uclibc.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Frysinger
Sent: den 6 maj 2009 11:43
To: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: no mail after git-push ?
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 05:24:50 Will Newton wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 14:29:09 Austin Foxley wrote:
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Applied to git (master/nptl).
Just a friendly reminder to rebase before pushing if you can. Otherwise
we will end up with a lot of 'Merge' commits that clutter up the history
like:
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 06:07:13 Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
From Mike Frysinger:
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 05:24:50 Will Newton wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
is not possible to receive git=push notificaation by emails as we
had for svn commit ?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org]
Sent: den 6 maj 2009 12:40
To: Peter Kjellerstedt
Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: no mail after git-push ?
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 06:07:13 Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
From Mike Frysinger:
On Wednesday 06
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 05:24:50 Will Newton wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
is not possible to receive git=push notificaation by emails as we
had for svn commit ?
The post-recieve-email
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 07:03:42 Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org]
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 06:07:13 Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
A step in the right direction, but the mails (judging by the ones
I received for busybox) seem to be lacking some vital
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
Hi,
For short diffs (10kB by default) it includes the diff in the
mail, and for longer diffs it includes a link instead
Mike we didnt have that before and no one complained that i know of,
Mike and mailman itself has a limit (40kB) which i
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 08:07:58 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Mike Frysinger writes:
For short diffs (10kB by default) it includes the diff in the
mail, and for longer diffs it includes a link instead
we didnt have that before and no one complained that i know of,
and mailman itself has a limit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin Foxley wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Indeed before actually pushing the changes, I've use git-push --dry-run.
Git notified that the repo was not in synch, so I've executed git-pull origin
(on both master and nptl branch), then git-push.
Mike == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
Hi,
We didn't? The commit-email.pl script did a check if the diff was
longer than 1000 lines and sent a link to viewvc instead otherwise. We
had that a few times in BR.
Mike yeah, you're right. i see that in the svn script. do people
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 08:55:31 Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Mike Frysinger writes:
We didn't? The commit-email.pl script did a check if the diff was
longer than 1000 lines and sent a link to viewvc instead otherwise. We
had that a few times in BR.
yeah, you're right. i see that in the svn
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 06:11:09 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 14:29:09 Austin Foxley wrote:
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Applied to git (master/nptl).
Just a friendly reminder to rebase before pushing if you can. Otherwise
we will end up with a lot of 'Merge' commits that
On Monday 27 April 2009 09:25:52 Christian MICHON wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:14 PM, rhabarber1848 wrote:
I also use gcc-3.4.6. This problem happens only with Kernel 2.6.17, not
with 2.6.9 nor with 2.6.26*.
I faced the same issue with uclibc-0.9.30* and linux-2.6.23. I thought
the fix
15 matches
Mail list logo
