Re: [PATCH/RFC] syscall: unify common syscall defines

2009-07-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 03 July 2009 16:50:22 Mike Frysinger wrote: > Unify all the common syscall defines in syscalls-common.h and scrub all > the duplicated code from relevant ports. This should also make converting > existing ports to INLINE_SYSCALL() much easier as they don't have to get > lost in all the u

Re: using -I with gcc paths instead of -isystem

2009-07-05 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 04:47:11PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >in commit 18f27be3, the gcc paths were changed from "-iwithprefix" and a short >name to "-I" and a full path. is there a reason you didnt use "-isystem" ? >these are after all gcc system paths, not package-specific include paths,

Re: [PATCH 00/13] Cleanup for gcc-4.4

2009-07-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 26 June 2009 15:14:15 Ron wrote: > I've been updating our toolchain to use gcc-4.4 and uclibc from the current > master HEAD. The following patches clean up a number of things that new > gcc complains about. It's not everything, but this lot at least should be > fairly uncontroversial an

using -I with gcc paths instead of -isystem

2009-07-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
in commit 18f27be3, the gcc paths were changed from "-iwithprefix" and a short name to "-I" and a full path. is there a reason you didnt use "-isystem" ? these are after all gcc system paths, not package-specific include paths, and gcc changes its behavior depending on the two. for example, w