Re: Need roundf() patch for 0.9.28

2009-08-20 Thread Philip A. Prindeville
Kevin Day wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Philip A. > Prindeville wrote: >> Yes, I know 0.9.28 is horribly old, and we'll upgrade eventually... For >> now, I need to patch it to include roundf() so I can support Asterisk 1.6. >> >> Anyone have a patch for this or directions for doing so?

Re: Need roundf() patch for 0.9.28

2009-08-20 Thread Kevin Day
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Philip A. Prindeville wrote: > Yes, I know 0.9.28 is horribly old, and we'll upgrade eventually... For > now, I need to patch it to include roundf() so I can support Asterisk 1.6. > > Anyone have a patch for this or directions for doing so? > > Thanks, > > -Philip

Re: Need roundf() patch for 0.9.28

2009-08-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 20 August 2009 17:09:21 Philip A. Prindeville wrote: > Yes, I know 0.9.28 is horribly old, and we'll upgrade eventually... For > now, I need to patch it to include roundf() so I can support Asterisk 1.6. there is no roundf implementation is libm/ > Anyone have a patch for this or dir

Need roundf() patch for 0.9.28

2009-08-20 Thread Philip A. Prindeville
Yes, I know 0.9.28 is horribly old, and we'll upgrade eventually... For now, I need to patch it to include roundf() so I can support Asterisk 1.6. Anyone have a patch for this or directions for doing so? Thanks, -Philip ___ uClibc mailing list uClibc

Re: [patch] Fix m68k syscalls

2009-08-20 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Hi Maxim, On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:49:00PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: >Hello, > >As described in thread >http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2009-July/042670.html, >uClibc build is currently broken on m68k. The attached patch ports slightly OT, but you seem to have an m68k box.. I once