On Sunday 30 August 2009 03:33:53 Khem Raj wrote: > +#if defined __UCLIBC_HAS_LFS__ && (!defined __NR_fadvise64_64 || !defined > _syscall6)
no code should be checking for _syscall6 existence anymore. if an arch doesnt support it, it is broken and that is that. we arent catering to these broken arches anymore. ignoring that, it makes no sense anyways. you arent using _syscall6() in this code ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
