On Friday 23 April 2010 09:29:10 Austin Foxley wrote:
> > Since it seems that ld.so soname is hardcoded in GCC. If you want to
> > use something else than /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 as dynamic linker, you also
> > need to update GCC default configration, create alternate specfile
> > overriding the hardco
On Friday 23 April 2010 10:08:42 Timo Teräs wrote:
> Austin Foxley wrote:
> > On 04/23/2010 07:18 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
> >> Austin Foxley wrote:
> >>> On 04/20/2010 07:49 AM, Natanael Copa wrote:
> Since sublevel releases are not ABI compatible we need to adjust
> the soname to include t
On Monday 26 April 2010 00:43:35 Timo Teräs wrote:
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> So this is what I came up with. I do wonder if not linux_resolver
> need PROTECTED support too? Have you tested with LAZY relocation too?
> >>>
> >>> Have not tested lazy yet.
> >>
> >> The LAZY relocs is a big
В сообщении от Пятница 30 апреля 2010 18:18:33 автор Roman I Khimov написал:
> I've not found any better solution than to introduce local __errno_location
> wrapper which seems to work fine (fixed 7 nptl tests).
Actually, found one, forget the patch as it is broken.
I think there is a bug in ldso
